Just as an FYI
Material choice is not necessarily an indication of a good string. I"™m referring to where it was inferred that since TM uses the same material as WC it must be good.
The real trick in string making is the construction: end servings and pre-stretch in particular. Most people will assume that because 452 has less inherent creep as a raw string material, that if they buy a string made of 452 it will be automatically better than 8125 or D75 thin or another material that inherently has a bit more creep. That is absolutely not true. I"™ve had poorly made "ścustom"ť strings from 452 creep in considerable amounts. And I"™ve had 8125 strings like Winners Choice not creep any noticeable amount.
By and large Winners Choice unique construction is what makes them such excellent strings, regardless of whether you buy their "śstock"ť 8125, or 452 or Ultra-Cam or whatever.
Don"™t assume just because it"™s the same raw material that it"™s just as good from one manufacturer to the other.
Furthermore, although WCCB uses 8125, "śword on the street"ť from industry folk I know is that they have an exclusive on a particular "śunwaxed"ť (not my terminology) version of 8125 from BCY. Don"™t know if that is fact or not, but I do know you can look at their 8125 strings and see (compared to say Stone Mountain Dakota or another similar to WCCB construction string made of 8125) that there is a noticeable difference.
I"™m not trying to rag on TailorMade or any other string manufacturer, just throwing out some food for thought.