logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Technical

Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2007, 02:24 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 23
Default aluminum vs. Carbon

I heard aluminum arrows break easily and I was wondering if I should stick with carbon, my dad uses It and he is also a member on the site I don't know his username but any suggestions will help on if I should use carbon arrows.
bghunter7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 02:39 PM   #2
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

I use both. I find carbons break easier when striking something they shouldn't. And seem to do it easier faster they go. Aluminums don't break so much as bend when hitting what they shouldn't. I have shattered carbons skimming trees, hitting shoulders (probably more the thunderhead fault), and many more instances. I have used both for over 20 years, and find both have a lifetime. I have recently found carbons losing spine over time. I do like to shoot small diameter, and doing that with alums can be tough. I also like 420-500gr arrows. Alums are great, inexpensive and I can't say I have killed more effectively with carbons over alums. I do find aluminums have more consistent spine and straighter. Also find fletching easier and tougher.

Take your pick. For carbons, I like carbon express edges CX and beman Black max (even though I have had trouble with them).
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 03:52 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,295
Send a message via Yahoo to Paul L Mohr
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

I have never broke an aluminum arrow, where as I have broke countless carbons. Like bigcountry said, I have bent my share though.

I can honestly say I have never ruined an aluminum in a manor that would not have also ruined a carbon. And I shoot fairly thin walled aluminums, not the thick heavy ones.

Paul
__________________
I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to eat carrots! (Ron White)
Paul L Mohr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 04:47 AM   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,413
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

Quote:
I have never broke an aluminum arrow,
How lucky can you get? I've broken tons of aluminum arrows (and carbons). A deflection where it ends up hitting something else sideways usually does the trick. Maybe it more an indication of my shooting ability, but I could fill a pretty large container with them.
Straightarrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 08:39 AM   #5
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,606
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

I too have broken my fair share of aluminums. ThoughI haven't used aluminum since the first poltruded carbon arrows hit the market.

Even though both can break the aluminum bends much easier and will not take as much abuse from tight grouping arrows when they make contact with each other in the target. An aluminum arrow will crease from sideimpactmuch easier than a carbon will crack from side impact.

However, it is much easier to see damage in an aluminum shaft than it is in a carbon shaft.

A lot of this will also depend on how thick the walls are on each type of arrow shaft.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
bigbulls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 09:48 AM   #6
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,161
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

IMO, an arrow straightener should be standard equipment for everyone who shoots aluminum. Yes, aluminum bends, but that means it can also be bent back and straightened. Even creases can be taken out, but I'll keep that procedure my little secret for now.

Most bends can be easily fixed with a little patience and experience with the tool. Even without the tool, a lot of bends can be straightened by hand. With a fine eye, or checking by spinning, they can be brought back at least as straight as a cheap carbon.

And, as bigbulls pointed out, the thicker the walls on aluminum arrows the more durable they are. I think .015" thickness is about the minimum for best durability. If you want light arrows for max speed, then you're better off with carbon than thin walled aluminum.

It's the light arrow speed freaks who came up with this idea that aluminum arrows are so fragile. Most of them never shot anything heavier than a 2213 or 2413 and have no idea what kind of punishment an arrow like a 2216 or 2315 can take before being damaged. Go on up the scale to 2219, 2317 or 2419 and they are extraordinarily tough. Plenty heavy and slower too, but they sure hit hard when they get there.

Disregarding aluminum arrows because they can bend is like saying bows with aluminum risers are crap because they can get bent.

Keeping with the theme, how bent aluminums can usually be straightened, it must be pointed out that a carbon that's not straight can not be straightened and will NEVER be straight.
Arthur P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 10:09 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eveleth Minnesota USA
Posts: 134
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Arthur P

IMO, an arrow straightener should be standard equipment for everyone who shoots aluminum. Yes, aluminum bends, but that means it can also be bent back and straightened. Even creases can be taken out, but I'll keep that procedure my little secret for now.

Most bends can be easily fixed with a little patience and experience with the tool. Even without the tool, a lot of bends can be straightened by hand. With a fine eye, or checking by spinning, they can be brought back at least as straight as a cheap carbon.

And, as bigbulls pointed out, the thicker the walls on aluminum arrows the more durable they are. I think .015" thickness is about the minimum for best durability. If you want light arrows for max speed, then you're better off with carbon than thin walled aluminum.

It's the light arrow speed freaks who came up with this idea that aluminum arrows are so fragile. Most of them never shot anything heavier than a 2213 or 2413 and have no idea what kind of punishment an arrow like a 2216 or 2315 can take before being damaged. Go on up the scale to 2219, 2317 or 2419 and they are extraordinarily tough. Plenty heavy and slower too, but they sure hit hard when they get there.

Disregarding aluminum arrows because they can bend is like saying bows with aluminum risers are crap because they can get bent.

Keeping with the theme, how bent aluminums can usually be straightened, it must be pointed out that a carbon that's not straight can not be straightened and will NEVER be straight.
Amen to that
timbow2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 10:48 PM   #8
Typical Buck
 
ArrowMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NW Illinois
Posts: 697
Default RE: aluminum vs. Carbon

I too use them both. I like the straightness of aluminum and the way they fly. I don"™t think carbon can compare. But I do like the speed that you can get from carbon and the hit it makes. As far as more durable that"™s a coin toss. I hear people say that carbon is more durable but it depends on the shot. I have broken carbon going throw deer and shooting 3-Ds. I have never broken an aluminum or bent it on a deer, but have creased and broken them shooting 3-Ds. Now I not saying that aluminum wont break or bend on deer, It's just not happened to me yet.

The best advise is if your going with carbon don"™t be cheep. And if you go with aluminum I would get xx78, xx75 are good too.
__________________
Archery: a way of life

Mathews: DXT & Drenalin LD
The ultimate set of hunting bows!
Scent Lok
ArrowMike is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
carbon or aluminum? edelsite Technical 21 04-21-2009 05:39 AM
aluminum and carbon bdbwtie101 Bowhunting Gear Review 7 12-01-2005 06:15 PM
aluminum or carbon?? jbrodie7 Bowhunting 10 02-08-2004 01:56 PM
carbon vs aluminum bronko22000 Bowhunting 2 01-28-2004 08:24 PM
carbon v/s aluminum billw3fan Technical 13 09-11-2002 11:36 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 PM.