logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Technical

Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2007, 06:09 PM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,152
Default mini chrono experiment

The bow:

Vectrix, 26" draw, 60lbs, 1/4" tube peep, ripcord drop away, 326 grain CX maxima 3-D selects

Test one:
was done 2 weeks ago when the bow was fresh out of the box. I did not wax the string yet andthere were 3 brass nocks totalas a nockpoint system. The 3 shots through the chono averaged 252.

Test two:
was done today with one of those brass nocks removed and replaced with an eliminator button. I'd also freshly waxed the entire string and cables.The 3 shots averaged 253, so a gain of 1. According to the quote below, I should've gained 2-4 fps. I'm thinking that waxing the string added weight and sorta offset the would be gain? What do you think?

Test three:
was then immediately done with the only change being undoing the peep tube. The 3 shots averaged 254. Now I can see test 2 as dismissable but according to the quote below, I should've gained 6-10 fps by removing the rubber tubing. Honestly though, it's hard to imagine that simply removing the tubing could net a gain of 6-10 because afterall, it's not actually a part of the string. So either the info below isn't all that accurate or the chrono isn't. Any thoughts?

Quote:
String silencers will generally lose 5-8 fps or more (these are very dependent on the silencer design as well as where they are positioned in the string. The closer to the cam you can position the silencer, the less speed you will lose as a rule.) A brass nock means a speed loss of 2-4 fps. Rubber peep tubing robs 6-10 fps. Rubber e-buttons cause a speed loss of 2 fps each. And a string loop, without brass nocks, causes a speed loss of 1-3 fps.
This is where I got the quote:
http://www.bowhunting.net/artman/publish/BowTechJuly.shtml
__________________
I like big bucks and I cannot lie
Hoytail Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 06:33 PM   #2
 
Washington Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,006
Default RE: mini chrono experiment

Did you replace the peep with a tubless peep or did you perform the test with the original peep?

A peep that requires a tube is heavier than a tubless peep [more plastic, larger design]. Simply removing the tube doesn't add much speed. Removing the tubing and replacing that heavier peep will be what gains you a few fps.
__________________
The prey must have the predator, just as the predator needs the prey. One without the other is something less. The wolf without the deer becomes a dog. The deer without the wolf becomes a cow. And what does man become?
Washington Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 07:22 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,152
Default RE: mini chrono experiment

Test 3 was done with simply undoing the peep tube and leaving the 1/4" peep on the string whichnetted 1 fps.

I'm not sure exactly how much weight I'll be saving but as soon as G5 sends out their 5/16" peep (new unreleased product)to their vendors, I'll be ordering one. Hopefully, and I'm thinkingthat'll free up 4-5 fps over the current bulky tube style setup.
__________________
I like big bucks and I cannot lie
Hoytail Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 08:03 PM   #4
 
mobow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 13,082
Default RE: mini chrono experiment

I've kind of been noticing that parallel limb bows aren't as affected by string add ons.....I'm not sure why that is either, or if it is....It's just something I've started noticing. I say that, but when I took the string silencers OFF my Vectrix I LOST 7 fps....So maybe it does......

Are you SURE the poundage was the same? The string may have stretched just a bit, slowing it down some.
__________________
1995 Ford Ranger XL
Douglas Radial Tires
Super Blue headlights
Fiberglass front bumper
2400 pounds

14,229,600 #'s of KE
mobow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 09:11 PM   #5
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western New York
Posts: 565
Default RE: mini chrono experiment

Is 2-4 ft per second really enough to be overly worried with i think not. At 20 yards that extra 2-4 ft is so minimal its not practical to worry about it
__________________
2009 Bowtech Admiral
50 Cal Traditions XLT EXTREME camo/nickel
50 cal Omega ,thumbhole stock ,fluted stainless
Browning Citori "sporter" ULTRA 12 ga
Marlin 22 mag
Mossberg 12 ga Trophy Slugster /bushnell scope
Remington scoremaster 22, What gramps taught me to shoot with!! Sure do miss ya buddy

Half of being smart is knowing what your dumb at
matt068 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2007, 12:27 PM   #6
 
fufanu360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 207
Default RE: mini chrono experiment

Quote:
ORIGINAL: matt068

Is 2-4 ft per second really enough to be overly worried with i think not. At 20 yards that extra 2-4 ft is so minimal its not practical to worry about it
yea exactly haha i wouldnt even bother thinking about it...
__________________
TEAM ALPINE ARCHERY
fufanu360 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OK Mini DVD - Mini Cam users..... GMMAT Bowhunting 15 10-21-2008 08:22 PM
What chrono? Rick James Bowhunting 16 02-20-2008 07:25 PM
Mini-14 in 6.8SPC or Mini-30 jeepkid Guns 22 01-20-2008 12:07 PM
Anyone Chrono? bigcountry Traditional Archery 9 07-30-2007 08:22 AM
mini CHRONO experiment part 2 Hoytail Hunter Technical 2 03-13-2007 11:47 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 AM.