logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Small Game, Predator and Trapping

Small Game, Predator and Trapping From shooting squirrels in your backyard to calling coyotes in Arizona. This forum now contains trapping information..

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2007, 05:24 PM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
Bullet Hole Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,406
Default .223 vs 22-250

Which is a better gun for everything from squrriels to coyotes?
I want one and i was wandering if anyone wanted to sell one or trafe for a
Remington model 700 ADL .270. I bought it 1 year ago and i have put 14 rounds threw it.
__________________


Steel Force Broadheads Prostaff

Cap'n of Team 27, Monsters Inc.

Bullet Hole Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 05:46 PM   #2
 
jake smith09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South West, Ohio
Posts: 465
Send a message via Yahoo to jake smith09
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

If your wondering if a .223 or a .22-250 is good for squrriels no for coyotes definately. If your wanting to go squrriel hunting too then you need something like a .17 or less. A .223 or a 250 will tear the snot out of squrriels. Ive only had a few where they didnt get ruined because i was using FMJ's and i was doing head shots. For coyotes though.... go for it. Both will do but its just personal preference. I personally use a .223 which i enjoy.
__________________
Pain is weakness leaving the body USMC
----------------------------------
We cannot change the strength or direction of the wind, but we can adjust our sails to meet the challenges in our life!!!!
jake smith09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 05:51 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
fingerz42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Eldred, PA
Posts: 1,588
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

Jake I read an earlier post that said you use a .308... Which is it? Or do you own 29 guns?
fingerz42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 06:15 PM   #4
 
jake smith09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South West, Ohio
Posts: 465
Send a message via Yahoo to jake smith09
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

I never said i use a .308 i said ive shot one i never said i use one let alone have one!!! sorry for the confusion
__________________
Pain is weakness leaving the body USMC
----------------------------------
We cannot change the strength or direction of the wind, but we can adjust our sails to meet the challenges in our life!!!!
jake smith09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:52 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Bullet Hole Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,406
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

Thanks, i just wanted to use the .223 for blowin em up so we can video tape.
__________________


Steel Force Broadheads Prostaff

Cap'n of Team 27, Monsters Inc.

Bullet Hole Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 08:23 AM   #6
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

22-250 Rem, hands down. Faster, not much difference in ammo prices, (dont shoot surplus nato grade ammo, matchgrade or factory is the best unlees you hand load.) Still short action, generally more accurate, more energy transfer and more weight retention, longer trajectory and many quality guns are chambered for itas isthe .223. you can also work up loads higher if you hand load because of the case size and demensions.
__________________
When he gobbles, the Remington makes his head bobble!
NewYorkGobblers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 09:24 AM   #7
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Morgan County, IL
Posts: 1,073
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

Quote:
Thanks, i just wanted to use the .223 for blowin em up so we can video tape.
You're wanting to do what?
il coyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 10:40 AM   #8
Nontypical Buck
 
Bullet Hole Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,406
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

Blow up Squrriels with .223's
__________________


Steel Force Broadheads Prostaff

Cap'n of Team 27, Monsters Inc.

Bullet Hole Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 11:42 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Boonies, Alaska
Posts: 83
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

i blew up a couple spruce grouse with my .223 before i sold it, even got it on tape. i really didnt expect that much energy transfer, only found one wing of one i blew up, and gutted 2 others with more precise shots later

we taped it only because it was our only kills on our sheep hunt
__________________
warehouse.carlh.com
AkhunterTeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 08:14 AM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
HOGHUNTINGUNLIMITED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,570
Default RE: .223 vs 22-250

223. is the best for watching the squrriels blow up it dosn't give that bad of a kick back so you can see them blow up in your scope.

__________________
Team 1
"The Last Gobble"
09 Returning Champs
HOGHUNTINGUNLIMITED is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51 PM.