VX-III vs. Conquest

[newton29]

I have put Leupold VX-III's on my last 2 rifles--no complaints. I just bought a Sako 75, and am considering putting a Zeiss Conquest on it. Good move, or stick with what I know?

[timbercruiser]

I think you would be pleased with the Zeiss.

[salukipv1]

I do like my vx-III, but I also love my conquest.

I'd say my conquest is a better design, just smoother lines etc...compared to the leupy, but both have great glass, clear reticles etc...

I think zeiss is gonna be my new goto when I need new glass etc...

[Sheridan]

Both good.................Let's Hope $,$$$ It's like walking out of the mall with a gucci bag. IMO - sorry :-)

[bugsNbows]

If you stay with Leupy, use the VX3 not the older VXIII. It compares nicely to the Conquests. I've had both (at the same time) and give a slight edge to the Conquests. Actually, either is fine though.

[MALLARD76]

Another vote for the Zeiss.

[PaJack]

I made the "switch",I like the Conquest over Leupold...

[thndrchiken]

The Leupold has the edge with eye relief, the Zeiss with the glass. For the money I say Zeiss.

[Big Uncle]

Can't beat the VX 3, with the exception that some scopes with nearly the same quality cost a bit less. VX 3 is extremely durable and reliable, and it has been around a lot longer than the cheap Zeiss.

[Pennsybohunter]

newton, take a look at the Leupold VX-3 L. I used one for the entire season and am extremely happy with it!