RE: C.U.P. vs PSI
I have a feeling that it won't be long before all the ballistic labs that do the load workups for the published manuals universally use PSI data. The cost of piezo-electric pressure barrels and equipment will drop, and SAMMI has already published PSI standards for most commercial cartridges. In addition to piezo-electric equipment (which is the best but rather expensive) there is the Oehler strain gauge pressure testing equipment available that allow reasonably accurate pressure readings to be taken from a factory rifle (in PSI of course).
One thing is for sure, PSI is PSI. It is a genuine, quantifiable unit is measurement for pressure that can be converted to any other absolute unit of pressure (i.e. atm, pascal, mmHg, inHg, barye, etc...). CUP, on the other hand, while being better than nothing, is hardly an accurate measure of absolute pressure and variations are rampant. That is why there is no conversion from PSI to CUP. If CUP were a genuine linear unit of measure, then converting from one to the other would be as simple as multiplying by a constant. But CUP isn't a definate measure of absolute pressure, and there is no constant difference between CUP and PSI, so there is no possible way to directly convert from one to the other. Published CUP pressures are virtually meaningless when comparing different cartridges, and only provide a relative pressure comparison between two different loads for the same cartridge.
Mike
|