Saeed is a hunter and shooter of vast experience. I read Saeed's page on crimping some time ago. I can agree with it, up to a point.
Point is, accuracy and expectations of accuracy are both relative. I have a Lee Factory Crimp in .223 that I have used with good results in a semi-auto rifle. This rifle bangs the round pretty hard while loading and the Lee die prevents the bullet from setting back. The crimped rounds group well, also.
Quote:
|
Matt shoots 1/4 moa at 100 yards w/this rifle.
|
I didn't mean Matt shoots 1/4 MOA with his .375 H&H on a good day. I meant
any day.
Quote:
|
"Crimping a rifle round destroys accuracy."
|
Matt meant, if he were to crimp, he would not be getting 1/4 MOA. Matt might very well get 1/2 MOA with a crimp. But that's still destroying his accuracy. Matt's expectations are higher than most.
Crimping can for sure narrow your extreme velocity spread. The crimp keeps a momentary grip on the projectile, ensuring the projectile's release happens farther along the pressure curve, meaning the powder burns more evenly. Also, the crimp keeps a more consistent grip on the bullet than just a sized brass neck. A key to accuracy is consistency.
But, there is more than one way to skin a cat. Better ways too. Ask a 200 yard benchrest shooter if he crimps. Or, go to a Benchrest message board and bring it up. These guys are infamous for trying anything or doing anything, just to shrink groups down a few thousanths or so. They spend more time on the details than you would believe. Go ahead, ask them. Depending on the type of projectile and the rifle's chamber they will get their consistency by annealing and using bushing neck sizers on neck turned brass or loading the projectile to the lands, or loading the projectile measurably jammed into the lands.
If they are crimping, they aren't winning. You can't squeeze a Berger VLD or similiar, and make a more accurate round.