logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Religion

Religion Discuss how your religious views affect your hunting lifestyle. All religions are welcome to post.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2009, 04:12 AM   #1
Boone & Crockett
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 11,361
Default So Abortion is a God Given Right?

Abortion is a ‘God-Given Right,’ Declares Liberal Leader
Thursday, December 03, 2009
By Matt Cover, Staff Writer



Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.)
(CNSNews.com) – Rev. Carlton Veazy, president and CEO of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, told a small crowd of pro-abortion protesters that women have a “God-given right” to abortion and that opposition from pro-life congressmen and religious leaders would never take it away.

Veazy, closing speaker at a “Stop Stupak” rally on Capitol Hill staged by major pro-abortion groups such as Planned Parenthood, NARAL-Pro Choice, and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) told the crowd that not only did they have a constitutional right to abortion, but that they had a God-given one as well.

“Don’t let anybody tell you that religious people don’t support choice,” Veazy said at the gathering in the Dirksen Senate Office Building. “You not only have a constitutional right for abortion, but you have a God-given right.”

The rally was held to inspire abortion rights protesters ahead of a day of lobbying for federal funding of abortion in health care reform legislation. The event also served as an outlet for the activists to vent anger at the amendment offered by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) to the House health care bill.

The amendment prohibits any federal money from paying for any part of a health insurance plan that covers abortion and was successfully attached to the House bill in a bipartisan vote.

Pro-abortion members of Congress also attended the rally. They urged attendees to lobby hard against the Stupak amendment to have it stripped from a final version of the bill.

“Make no mistake, the Stupak amendment does not reaffirm existing law – it goes way past it,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.). “It disallows private insurers who operate in the new exchange from covering abortion services in plans receiving government subsidies.”

Calling the Stupak amendment “a stain,” DeLauro said that pro-abortion activists must make legislators “feel your wrath” if abortion coverage is to be preserved.

“So we all have a role to play in doing right by America’s women and making sure comprehensive health insurance reform finally gets passed,” DeLauro said. “But I am confident we will get there again, and that the Affordable Health Care for America Act will become the law of the land, without the stain of Stupak/Pitts.” (The Stupak amendment was co-written with Republican Rep. Joe Pitts of Pennsylvania.)




Baby at 5 months
“So make your voices heard!” said DeLauro. “Those Members who are pro-choice and who voted for Stupak should feel your wrath. Those who could not find their way clear to vote for health care, for whatever reason, should feel your wrath too.”

Protesters also took on the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), whose lobbying efforts were essential in passing the Stupak amendment, and which earned the ire of pro-abortion protesters.

DeLauro attacked the bishops, saying the organization’s lobbying effort may jeopardize its tax-exempt status. She also described the lobbying as “dubious.”

“As we have worked to secure this groundbreaking legislation, it was never our intention to make abortion part of the health care debate,” she said. “And, in fact, when the issue arose in the Energy and Commerce Committee, pro-choice and pro-life members came together around a compromise that ratified existing law.

“But sadly, the Conference of Catholic Bishops had other ideas,” said DeLauro. “They chose to hold comprehensive health care reform hostage to the abortion issue. In doing so, they not only used a dubious rationale that puts even their own federal funding at risk. They failed their fundamental obligation to help the poor and heal the sick.”

Veazy was even more direct, saying that protesters were there to “take on” the USCCB.

“We are also here to call out the U.S. Conference of [Catholic] Bishops, because no one religion, no theological perspective should get the kind of weight that they can [to] put pressure on the Congress,” he said.

“Hold the whole Congress up and say, ‘If we don’t get our way, we will work against health reform,’” said Veazy. “We in the religious community resent that. We believe that no religion should carry that kind of weight in legislation.”

Veazy reassured the crowd that the Stupak amendment would “not make it,” because “right will always win.”

“Stupak will not make it,” said Veazy. “I want you to go leave this place knowing that right will always win, and we are going to win Stupak.”
__________________
My knife website
www.knivesbyjank.com
The Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2009, 07:20 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Harford Co Maryland USA
Posts: 4,931
Default

Since this idiot liberal has made this ridiculous claim, let's see her scriptural references to back up her thoughts.
__________________
Today' s small bucks are tomorrow' s trophies.
[image]http://www.whitetails.com/deer8.html[image]
DaveH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2009, 05:57 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
nick_bleuer76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North Central, Iowa
Posts: 1,901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveH View Post
Since this idiot liberal has made this ridiculous claim, let's see her scriptural references to back up her thoughts.
X2 I am curious.
__________________
"Real knowledge is to know the extent of one’s ignorance."
nick_bleuer76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2009, 06:02 PM   #4
Typical Buck
 
sconnyhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NW, WI
Posts: 872
Default

As much as abortion may be a " God-given right" so is abstinence, and that comes with out all the problems of promiscuity. It also doesn't cost a loved ones life.
__________________
Life is what we make of it.
sconnyhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 07:58 AM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,588
Default

some times you have to ask ,which GOD !
cataway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 10:03 AM   #6
Dominant Buck
 
Rebel Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WC FL
Posts: 26,201
Default

There is only one Judge!...............Let them say what they want and do.......
__________________
Jesus said, "he who stands firm to the end will be saved" Mark 13:13.

Live Life in such a way that those who do not know Christ will come to know Him because they know you

"In God We Trust"
Rebel Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 10:11 AM   #7
Typical Buck
 
Mr. Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amongst far too many liberals
Posts: 919
Default



Is this a transvestite?
__________________
Rich

"It takes a Carter to get a Reagan."
Mr. Conservatism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 07:05 AM   #8
Boone & Crockett
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 11,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Conservatism View Post


Is this a transvestite?

I don't know which would be worse! The ugly man or the ugly woman..
__________________
My knife website
www.knivesbyjank.com
The Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 06:26 AM   #9
Spike
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 82
Default

Here are my thoughts on abortion...

Since the ruling of Roe v Wade, a prominent argument from pro abortion folks has been that if they (or more likely their daughter) are raped, they should have the choice to terminate that pregnancy. There is not a single decision forcing factor contributing to this viewpoint that isn’t completely and utterly selfish and caustic. Now let me assert that I view rape to be among the most horrific actions committable by humans. I think that those who maliciously rape women should be removed from society permanently. Now let’s look at the factors that attribute to this pro abortion decision. One might be that mothers can’t bear the fact that their daughter would be carrying an unwanted, out of wedlock child in their wombs. Another could be that a child resulting from a rape would tarnish their family’s social reputation. While there are surely other motivational factors worth mentioning that lead to the decision of terminating the pregnancy as far as I can see, they all relate to one’s selfish pride. Is this complete disregard for the value of human life any more righteous than the act that created the “questionable” pregnancy? Once an egg is fertilized by a sperm, the miraculous process of creating human life begins; a process that is altogether divine and magnificent. It is a process which cannot be fully comprehended and transcends the capabilities of our human minds. Only God can be cognizant of this process that He is Author of only he has the power and right to edit it. Other pro choice advocates claim that women have the right to decide what should be done with their bodies with respect to pregnancy. Well the basis of this assertion defeats itself because shouldn’t the fetus also have control over its own body? Is this not an example of one human exhibiting their will over another for their own selfish benefit? This statement means that the mother “owns” the baby and its human rights. Does this not strike an eerie resemblance to the premise of the civil rights and feminist movement that pro choice people likely advocate? Is this any different than a chauvinist man saying that he controls his wife’s decisions and social interactions? Dare I say this is worse because the resulting display of selfish control results in the destruction of human life? Every person who is pro abortion begins their existence in this vulnerable fetus stage. Could not some of these people even be products of parents who considered aborting the pregnancy that created them? Who is any human to say that their social reputation is more valuable than another human’s life? This assertion extends to all forms of and reasons for abortion. I guess the old “out of sight, out of mind” phrase is to blame here. Other arguments for abortion include instances where mental and/or physical retardation are eminent in the living human being who’s right to life is in question. This concept is similar to that of euthanasia. However, regardless of one’s opinion of euthanasia, wouldn’t the consensus view be to consult the person to be euthanized? Would not the subject’s opinion in the matter be of highest importance? So it is evident that the beneficiary of abortion decisions is the parent. In conclusion, any and all abortion should be made illegal except in the sole circumstance where the pregnancy unequivocally will mortally harm the mother because only in this instance is the value of life truly in comparison. If the mother wishes not to retain guardianship of the baby then the child should be given up for adoption in lieu of abortion.
__________________
Don't ask what the world needs of you. Instead, ask yourself what makes you come alive, because what the world needs is people that are alive.
wild at heart is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 PM.