The bible declares that God is a Spirit. Jesus said a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have. Connect the dots and see if we have an ape-like creature setting upon the throne of God.
But it also said that he created man in his image, which is composed of flesh and bone, so which one is it????
Quote:
My problem with evolution is the fact that something had to be there to evolve from. Where did that first living organism come from?
Right that is a good question.That is what I cant decide.
[align=right]
[/align]
It would seem that in 2008 they would have least created a single cell living organism, from dead chemicals. This would be the foundation of evolutionist retoric. But as it is a house without a foundation, and falls over on its self.
Using stem cell research and clonini they can grow body parts and they have even cloned a sheep about 10 years ago now (Dolly). I am not sure how they would do that using "Dead chemicals"
It would seem that in 2008 they would have least created a single cell living organism, from dead chemicals. This would be the foundation of evolutionist retoric. But as it is a house without a foundation, and falls over on its self.
Using stem cell research and clonini they can grow body parts and they have even cloned a sheep about 10 years ago now (Dolly). I am not sure how they would do that using "Dead chemicals"
Here, 2000 years ago the Word talks ofthose who think science and eviloution is more justified the the creation power of God. Pay special attention to the first and last verse! They pretty well sum up the whole thread!
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities"“his eternal power and divine nature"“have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
The bible declares that God is a Spirit. Jesus said a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have. Connect the dots and see if we have an ape-like creature setting upon the throne of God.
[/blockquote]
But it also said that he created man in his image, which is composed of flesh and bone, so which one is it????
[blockquote]quote:
My problem with evolution is the fact that something had to be there to evolve from. Where did that first living organism come from?
[/blockquote]
Right that is a good question.That is what I cant decide.
Which is it? John 1:14 reveals the secret, "The Word was made flesh". God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself. Jesus. the expressed image of the invisible God. I and my Father are ONE. He that hath seen me hath seen the Father. In him dwelleth the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
As far as evolution, There appears to be no starting place. One has to except it as fact that something had to be there to start the processes of evolving. Where did that mysterious substance come from? To me that is a concession to creation before evolution could begin.
They say god created the universe in 6 days? something to that affect right?
one thing I've never heard anyone point out, is define a "day" 6 earth days? why if god created the universe would 6 earth days be the definition of a day?
some planets, venus Ibeleive has a day.....that's something like 234 earth years.....so my point...."6 days" could in fact be thousands and thousands of "earth days/years"
They say god created the universe in 6 days? something to that affect right?
one thing I've never heard anyone point out, is define a "day" 6 earth days? why if god created the universe would 6 earth days be the definition of a day?
some planets, venus Ibeleive has a day.....that's something like 234 earth years.....so my point...."6 days" could in fact be thousands and thousands of "earth days/years"
You are Correct!What you have said is even biblical.
2Peter3:8
But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
__________________
Elm River Hunt Club
Wayne County Illinois
www.illinoisdeerhunters.com
The theory of evolution is exactly that, a THEORY. I don't think that a fear of science is very healthy, but denying God's hand in science is VERY unhealthy. If God created the world, then He created the scientific and physical laws that bind the world together. Sir Isaac Newton did not WRITE the law of gravity. This law existed since the time GOD wrote it. As a mere mortal with limited abilities, he merely stumbled upon an explanation of God's physical law which other mortal men could grasp in their limited intellect.
Science and theories should not be feared or shunned, but rather explored as a way to further reveal God's brilliance. I don't think we mere mortals need fear revealing all of His Divine wisdom in our finite existence.
__________________
Vizslas... because life's too short to hunt with an ugly dog.
Take a warrior hunting!! http://www.warriorsoutdoors.com/
They say god created the universe in 6 days? something to that affect right?
one thing I've never heard anyone point out, is define a "day" 6 earth days? why if god created the universe would 6 earth days be the definition of a day?
some planets, venus Ibeleive has a day.....that's something like 234 earth years.....so my point...."6 days" could in fact be thousands and thousands of "earth days/years"
God was talking about the earth - specifically - when describing creation week. Re-read the first chapter of Genesis, it's very clear on this.
One more thing . . . if creation week took millions of years and evolution was supposedly taking place during this time . . . how can we explain the deaths of all the "less fit" creatures during this time . . . before sin caused death to be brought about?
__________________
Today' s small bucks are tomorrow' s trophies.
[image]http://www.whitetails.com/deer8.html[image]
Evolution is just a scientific theory, it does not contain any eternal truths. It is accepted by most scientists not because it represents an unquestionable reality but because it is the best natural explanation for the evidence we are able to examin and anylize. Like anyother scientific theory such as atomic theory or the electromagnetic theory it makescertain predictions that can be tested against what we actually observe. For example evolution predicts that instead of being scattered through the geologic column, fossils will be found in a specific order with the most primitive life forms being in the lowest layersand the most advanced in the highest layers which is exactly which is observed. The Theory of Evolution also predicts certainorganisms will have more DNA in common with somedifferent organisms than others. This has also been found to be true. Scientific theories are provisionally accepted as true if they make predictions that can be and are verified and there is no scientificevidence that falsifies them. This is exactly the postion that the Theory of Evolution is in at the present time. Scientific theoriesdo change and are sometimes even discarded as new evidence comes to light. DLG is correct that even in the unlikely event that the Theory of Evolution is falsified and abondoned by science it is not going to be replaced by Genesis in classrooms and laboratories. SinceGenesis does not make predictions that can be scientifically verified, nor is it falsifiable, itcan not be accepted as a scientific theory even if it is a widely held religious belief.
RE: whats your opinion
