evolution can't account for all.

[turkey jerky]

A pair of discoveries this month along with a handful of others in 2005 have begun to reveal what some astronomers long suspected: The outer solar system contains a dizzying array of round worlds on countless odd trajectories around the sun, often with multiple satellite systems.


"The problem is, current theories of the solar system's formation and evolution can't account for it all"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20051219/sc_space/thesolarsystemgetscrazier;_ylt=AoBZ4Ej3Vk6.5XHNvFC f3M6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MzV0MTdmBHNlYwM3NTM-

[Tazman]

Interesting, Gods creations are so spectacular and massive that mortal men will never fathom it all, God's timeis without beginning or end, as mere men we have a hard time grasping 200 years, God's space is also without beginning or end, yet we can not comprehend a light year, we can explain it, but to understand it is something else.

Many of us think we understand God, what we understand is what he wants us to understand because he knows we could not even begin to understand what he knows.

[DaveH]

Evolution can't account for ANY of it. Most of it is based on assumptions which have never been - and never will be - proven

[manuman]

Man Taz--I was looking for a copy and paste credit there--good words, maybe you missed your calling!

[JoeA]

The current theories describe what we saw. The more we see, the more things we have to take into account.

Did maps of the known world become innaccurate after Columbus returned from the New World? No. Did the N. American & S. American continents not exist untila cartographer draw them on a map? No.

How is this different?

[farm hunter]

Interesting article indeed - but I think you misinterpreted the meaning of "evolution" in this context.

Go back and read it if you like:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20051219/sc_space/thesolarsystemgetscrazier;_ylt=AoBZ4Ej3Vk6.5XHNvFC f3M6s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MzV0MTdmBHNlYwM3NTM

but what they are saying is that the generally accepted theory regarding the evolution of our Solar System suggests that the elipticalorbits of ourplanetary objects - are are result of their formation around the our Star (the Sun). The orbita couple of the outerplanetery formations - past pluto - DO NOT conform only to this theory - like commonly known 9 planets do.As a result, some astronomers are suggesting theories that could explain the offset orbits of these bodies.

The leading theory suggests that a "passing star" deposited or maybe even swapped with some planentary material into our solar system - in its formation. In space - the effects of gravity (mass) - once set into motion - willbe evident millions - even billions of years later.

So basically - the orbit of this outer "planet" in our solar system was likely effected by events outside the formation of the solar system itself. Maybe from theKuiper Belt, or even the Oort Cloud.


FH

[Tazman]

Farm hunter I concur that the article itself had nothing to do with TOE, I read it entirely and did find it interesting. The title of the thread may have been better stated something to the effect of "Science still can not explain Creation"

[Tazman]

ORIGINAL: manuman

Man Taz--I was looking for a copy and paste credit there--good words, maybe you missed your calling!

No cut and paste there Brother, what calling do you think I missed?