logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Religion

Religion Discuss how your religious views affect your hunting lifestyle. All religions are welcome to post.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2005, 12:25 AM   #1
Dominant Buck
 
Rebel Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WC FL
Posts: 26,201
Default Question on KJV

I have been reading and studying the AKJV for over
40yrs and this has always been on the back of my mind.

Oil lamps were being used.
Candles were not invented when Revelations was written.

(Rev 1:12 NIV) I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me.And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,

(Rev 1:12 KJV) And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;

Although the origin of candles is obscure, they are mentioned by Philon [b. Byzantium (Turkey), c. 280 bce, d. c. 220 bce] about this time. Some think candles were invented by the Etruscans. Tapers (wicks dipped in wax once) and wax-impregnated reeds preceded candles, but the earliest form of artificial lighting device was the oil lamp. Even at this time, and for the next 2000 years, lamps are preferred to candles as light sources.
__________________
Jesus said, "he who stands firm to the end will be saved" Mark 13:13.

Live Life in such a way that those who do not know Christ will come to know Him because they know you

"In God We Trust"
Rebel Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 07:51 AM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
Knightia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wy
Posts: 7,516
Default RE: Question on KJV

A simple change( a reflection of the time diffences involved?). If you dont mind A question- why do these kinda things matter?In the big picture of things? Is it because if one thing is wrong there could be others?And this will make believers doubt? It has many authors dosnt it?And they are men. I would personaly expect it to have mistakes& even maybe somechanges(all books written by men).

But thats just me &that is contary to what many seem to think here - "Its the perfect words of god& flawless"?( but im not sure why they think that(is it in the bible?)- that they are told the bible is perfect? Even it says men arent perfect right?(i can believe that)Why would a book written by men be perfect?

also something like i have heard ppl say i guess to- The bible - its all or nothing- )same idea i guess.

__________________
Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.-- Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 18)

Things ain't what they used to be and probably never was. ~Will Rogers

Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday.


"Shouldn't someone tag Mr. Kennedy's 'bold new imaginative program' with its proper age?" "Under the tousled boyish haircut it is still old Karl Marx—first launched a century ago.
There is nothing new in the idea of a government being Big Brother to us all. R.Reagan-1960
Knightia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 09:48 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The socialist state of Massachusetts
Posts: 1,146
Default RE: Question on KJV

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Rebel Hog

I have been reading and studying the AKJV for over
40yrs and this has always been on the back of my mind.

Oil lamps were being used.
Candles were not invented when Revelations was written.

(Rev 1:12 NIV) I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me.And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,

(Rev 1:12 KJV) And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;

Although the origin of candles is obscure, they are mentioned by Philon [b. Byzantium (Turkey), c. 280 bce, d. c. 220 bce] about this time. Some think candles were invented by the Etruscans. Tapers (wicks dipped in wax once) and wax-impregnated reeds preceded candles, but the earliest form of artificial lighting device was the oil lamp. Even at this time, and for the next 2000 years, lamps are preferred to candles as light sources.
Such things stem from the fact that the King James Version is just one of many translations. It is no more and no less authoritative than other translations.
Here are some other interesting thingsI have noticed asI read theKing James:
Acts 9:7
And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.

Acts 22:9
And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.


(Obviously, both of those accounts cannot be true.)

Acts 12:4
And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.


(This is the only time that the pagan holiday "easter" is mentioned in KJV. The same Greek word is properly translated as "passover" in 28 other instances.)

Matthew 9:17
Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.


(Other versions use such words as "wineskins" instead of "bottles". They are correct to do so.)

Matthew 20:9-10
And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour, they received every man a penny. [10] But when the first came, they supposed that they should have received more; and they likewise received every man a penny.


(NIV and other modern tranlations use the word "denarius" instead of "penny". The "penny" was an unknown coin in those times. The "denarius" was an actual Roman coin.)

My point is this: Every Bible version is a translation from the original language.Not one of them is perfect in every way. In fact, the KJV is probably more inaccurate than some of the newer translations. That said, it is still God's Word. For those who do not have a working knowledge of Greek and Hebrew, it is good to compare many translations toobtain a fuller understanding of the meaning of the original words as the Holy Spirit uses them to show us God's truth.

Clint












p
Clint. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 10:05 AM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Harford Co Maryland USA
Posts: 4,931
Default RE: Question on KJV

Good post Clint. Even though I have done most of my scripture memorization in the KJV because of the way it's written, I usually do not use the KJV for study because of the way it's written. I use the NIV and NASB regularly as well and the RSV and NKJV because IMO, they are easier to understand. Using ALL of them gives a more complete picture and more clearly represents what God intended when HE inspired the original manuscripts. The orginal manuscripts ARE completely inerrant and ARE the inspired Word of God. Anytime you change the wording from the original, you risk altering the meaning somewhat. Every time I thought I had found a contradiction and checked it out, I discovered that it was MY understanding of it that was flawed--not God's word. Most translations are subject to simple mistakes that do not lead people down the wrong path. This does NOT mean we cannot take every word of it as true. Simple mistakes might exist, but they do not significantly alter the meaning enough to change the true essence of what God wanted us to know. He has made sure that we get what He wanted us to get.
__________________
Today' s small bucks are tomorrow' s trophies.
[image]http://www.whitetails.com/deer8.html[image]
DaveH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 10:10 AM   #5
Dominant Buck
 
Rebel Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WC FL
Posts: 26,201
Default RE: Question on KJV

Thanks Bro.Clint for replying, it makes sense to me.
__________________
Jesus said, "he who stands firm to the end will be saved" Mark 13:13.

Live Life in such a way that those who do not know Christ will come to know Him because they know you

"In God We Trust"
Rebel Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 11:17 AM   #6
Boone & Crockett
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 11,363
Default RE: Question on KJV

KJV is the closest to the original texts found. However since most of us do not speak in King James English anymore, other translations have been derived. I use the NKJ in my preaching only because it is understood better by those hearing the word. However for a deeper understand and word study the KJV is best,... But one thing we must all realize. There are a lot of God's people swallowing the fruit and choaking on the seed! I have heard some say, if it's not the KJV it's not God's word. But I like Paul would rather someone understand five words, than ten thousand words read and not understood. A good example is Heb. 1:1 KJV. God, who at sundry times and divers manner spake in the time past unto the fathers by the prophets. Heb 1:1 NKJV God, who at various times in in various ways spoke n the time past to the fathers by the prophets.... You and I may understand that completely, however most people are lost after a few words.. After all, the Bible is written for a specific purpose, that purpose would be defeated if not completly and thourly understood.
__________________
My knife website
www.knivesbyjank.com
The Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 11:33 AM   #7
Fork Horn
 
leafriverlizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The deep south
Posts: 270
Default RE: Question on KJV

I also use both the KJV and the NKJV. I also like using the ESword that gman told us about on an earlier thread. It has over 20 different bible versions to compare with, plus many commentaries. I agree with DaveH that the bible is not contradictory, it is just the way mankind interprets it that can be contradictory.
__________________
"And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose." Romans 8:28
leafriverlizzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 06:09 PM   #8
Fork Horn
 
WARedBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winston Salem NC
Posts: 356
Send a message via Yahoo to WARedBear
Default RE: Question on KJV

All books written by men might have mistakes...books or letters written by men, inspired by God for God...do not have mistakes. None! Nobody has ever been able to find one single mistake, contridiction, or misguided word. Why? Because the Bilbe is from God...not man.

In His Service
__________________
Ret. USAF

My wife says that I may not be the brightest crayon in the box
but I sure am a happy magic marker.

WARedBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 07:07 PM   #9
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,184
Default RE: Question on KJV

they are right it is in the way men wrote it from the hebrew text in hebrew one wood has a lot of meaning and was wrote the way they throughtit should be not always right but very close.
__________________
1 shot 1 kill
renfrowridge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2005, 07:12 PM   #10
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Question on KJV

Rebel, I thought during the age of Nero, He used wax for light. Also didn't he kill the christians sometimes and hang them up soaked in wax and light them to light the way. I just couldn't imagine how grusom that could be.
  Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yet another TC Pro Hunter Question and Question on shooting from a stand Otsdawa_Game_Hunter Whitetail Deer Hunting 5 10-20-2008 10:36 AM
whisker biscuit question and back tension question millerhunter13 Technical 11 04-16-2008 08:09 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 PM.