They want to butt in on someone elses personal life.

[Charlie P]

WHEN U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (above) spoke Tuesday night at NYU's Vanderbilt Hall, "The room was packed with some 300 students and there were many protesters outside because of Scalia's vitriolic dissent last year in the case that overturned the Texas law against gay sex," our source reports. "One gay student asked whether government had any business enacting and enforcing laws against consensual sodomy. Following Scalia's answer, the student asked a follow-up: 'Do you sodomize your wife?' The audience was shocked, especially since Mrs. Scalia [Maureen] was in attendance. The justice replied that the question was unworthy of an answer."

[North Texan]

Idiots like this fascinate me. Why do something that reflects poorly on your own school and your own record?

[tardfarmer]

What kills me is that the pickle puffers are now declaring victory by proclaiming that Scalia's response of "thats not worthy of an answer" is the same as saying he does the poop chute boogie on his wife.


BRILLIANT logic.

[david m]

it was a stupid follow up...but the original question is valid.

the government doesn't exist for that judgment.

[Charlie P]

He thinks it's alright for the goverment to invade the privacy of two consenting adults. What's wrong with the question,especilaly when he comes out and say's

:Justice Scalia surprised his audience at Harvard University, telling them: "I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged."

[Charlie P]

thats not worthy of an answer" is the same as saying he does the poop chute boogie on his wife.

What did you think when Bush said he wouldn't answer the question about his drug use?

BTW It wouldn't have to be poop shoot oral sex is also sodomy.

[tardfarmer]

it was a stupid follow up...but the original question is valid.

No it wasn't, it was a snub, the same as saying "you're a disgusting azz clown and i'm not going to answer that stupid question".. but more politically correct.

the government doesn't exist for that judgment.

Really? That issue was put in place in the past for the sake of public health. And we see through the BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS in aids spending that the issue indeed is not a moot point.

[Charlie P]

One of the definition is Sodomy:Anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex

.

Really? That issue was put in place in the past for the sake of public health

LOl sure it was, why was the Texas law only for homosexuals then?

[tardfarmer]

What did you think when Bush said he wouldn't answer the question about his drug use?

The same as when Bork was asked. At that point, it's none of their business. If he was doing it while in office or shortly beforehand, then it's an issue.

Ever hear of the 5th Amendment?

[tardfarmer]

One of the definition is Sodomy:Anal or oral copulation with a member of the opposite sex.

Very good charlie.. but we all know what part of that definition was the one that was considered and still is considered a public health risk.