RE: Global Warming Extra
Some good points. In global warming, some people will be losers and others will be winners. Some regions presently unsuitable to agriculture may become adundantly productive. Desserts may bloom.
I don't agree that there is a concensus on human beings causing global warming. Reference Michael Crichton's discussions of the role of politicization of this global warming issue and previous episodes of politicized science -- for example the eugenics movement in the 1800s and its progeny. Hell, we didn't even know el nino and el nano were major weather patterns until recently. "Many's the slip 'twixt the cup 'n the lip" when dealing with something so politically loaded as the question "are CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels the dominant cause of currently observable global warming" question. No question the global temperatures are rising: the question is whether CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels is the dominant cause. I just don't buy that we understand the issue well enough to dramatically limit, nay, cripple our economies because maybe our fossil fuel burning is causing the problem.
|