It is typical John Kerry. He's in attack mode but hasn't offered one single idea for what he will do as president.
And the Democrats say that Bush is the one who goes on attack mode. Some moron from the Washington Post on Fox News prior to the start of the debate said that Bush has to be "less macho," meaning he has to cut back the attacks. As if Kerry hasn't been running the same sort of campaign.
Thankfully, the majority of the American people see right through John Flip-Flop Kerry.
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
He evades the points GW makes very well, I agree. A much better orator (typical of a Liberal Democrat)
But GW still comes across as believable.
But Kerry keeps saying he voted to do the job in Iraq - and that very vote to allow GW to do it was wrong ??
Another thing ...... the best laid plans WILL FAIL. They always do and they need changed, tweaked and modified along the ways. So to say looking back that it was wrong when you yourself John said it was right ? Thats crazy, its flip flop .......... its what GW mentioned over and over tonight.
I am tiered of Kerry using Vietnam as some sort of gain in this election. I think Bush did an outstanding job, and as for Kerry...well i am glad that i am not him come election night.
And he (kerry) is such flip-flopper
__________________
Country by the grace of God...and remember..GIT-R-DONE
I think Kerry had a much better performance, but Bush had him on substance. I would say Kerry probably won the debate, but not so substantially that it will make a difference.
I only say this because performance gets judged more than substance by when it comes to debates. I doubt anybody out there was actually swayed to vote one way or another.
tonights debate - what do you think ?
