logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2004, 07:52 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,602
Default This is jut for Gobbler (RE: Bush in the Guard)

*Bush"s National Guard years
**Before you fall for Dems" spin, here are the facts *

What do you really know about George W. Bush"s time in the Air National
Guard?
That he didn"t show up for duty in Alabama? That he missed a physical?
That his daddy got him in?

News coverage of the president"s years in the Guard has tended to focus
on one brief portion of that time " to the exclusion of virtually
everything else. So just for the record, here, in full, is what Bush did:

The future president joined the Guard in May 1968. Almost immediately,
he began an extended period of training. Six weeks of basic training.
Fifty-three weeks of flight training. Twenty-one weeks of
fighter-interceptor training.

That was 80 weeks to begin with, and there were other training periods
thrown in as well. It was full-time work. By the time it was over, Bush
had served nearly two years.

Not two years of weekends. Two years.

After training, Bush kept flying, racking up hundreds of hours in F-102
jets. As he did, he accumulated points toward his National Guard service
requirements. At the time, guardsmen were required to accumulate a
minimum of 50 points to meet their yearly obligation.

According to records released earlier this year, Bush earned 253 points
in his first year, May 1968 to May 1969 (since he joined in May 1968,
his service thereafter was measured on a May-to-May basis).

Bush earned 340 points in 1969-1970. He earned 137 points in 1970-1971.
And he earned 112 points in 1971-1972. The numbers indicate that in his
first four years, Bush not only showed up, he showed up a lot. Did you
know that?

That brings the story to May 1972 " the time that has been the focus of
so many news reports " when Bush "deserted" (according to anti-Bush
filmmaker Michael Moore) or went "AWOL" (according to Terry McAuliffe,
chairman of the Democratic National Committee).

Bush asked for permission to go to Alabama to work on a Senate campaign.
His superior officers said OK. Requests like that weren"t unusual, says
retired Col. William Campenni, who flew with Bush in 1970 and 1971.

"In 1972, there was an enormous glut of pilots," Campenni says. "The
Vietnam War was winding down, and the Air Force was putting pilots in
desk jobs. In "72 or "73, if you were a pilot, active or Guard, and you
had an obligation and wanted to get out, no problem. In fact, you were
helping them solve their problem."

So Bush stopped flying. From May 1972 to May 1973, he earned just 56
points " not much, but enough to meet his requirement.

Then, in 1973, as Bush made plans to leave the Guard and go to Harvard
Business School, he again started showing up frequently.

In June and July of 1973, he accumulated 56 points, enough to meet the
minimum requirement for the 1973-1974 year.

Then, at his request, he was given permission to go. Bush received an
honorable discharge after serving five years, four months and five days
of his original six-year commitment. By that time, however, he had
accumulated enough points in each year to cover six years of service.

During his service, Bush received high marks as a pilot.

A 1970 evaluation said Bush "clearly stands out as a top notch fighter
interceptor pilot" and was "a natural leader whom his contemporaries
look to for leadership."

A 1971 evaluation called Bush "an exceptionally fine young officer and
pilot" who "continually flies intercept missions with the unit to
increase his proficiency even further." And a 1972 evaluation called
Bush "an exceptional fighter interceptor pilot and officer."

Now, it is only natural that news reports questioning Bush"s service "
in /The Boston Globe /and /The New York Times/, on CBS and in other
outlets " would come out now. Democrats are spitting mad over attacks on
John Kerry"s record by the group Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

And, as it is with Kerry, it"s reasonable to look at a candidate"s
entire record, including his military service " or lack of it. Voters
are perfectly able to decide whether it"s important or not in November.

The Kerry camp blames Bush for the Swift boat veterans" attack, but
anyone who has spent much time talking to the Swifties gets the sense
that they are doing it entirely for their own reasons.

And it should be noted in passing that Kerry has personally questioned
Bush"s service, while Bush has not personally questioned Kerry"s.

In April " before the Swift boat veterans had said a word " Kerry said
Bush "has yet to explain to America whether or not, and tell the truth,
about whether he showed up for duty." Earlier, Kerry said, "Just because
you get an honorable discharge does not, in fact, answer that question."

Now, after the Swift boat episode, the spotlight has returned to Bush.

That"s fine. We should know as much as we can.

And perhaps someday Kerry will release more of his military records as well.
__________________
We must be the change we wish to see in the world -- Ghandi
http://www.rightminded.net
BenGarrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2004, 05:26 PM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
etothepii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 8,548
Default RE: This is jut for Gobbler (RE: Bush in the Guard)

Just bumping this one back up to the top.
__________________
Spammers: Thanks for share.
etothepii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2004, 08:12 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: illinois
Posts: 2,019
Default RE: This is jut for Gobbler (RE: Bush in the Guard)

bump it again it is good reading
__________________
Good friends are like butt cheeks some crap might come between them ,but they will always come back together
bob d  is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2004, 08:16 PM   #4
Host of Hosts
 
PABuck_HNTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Erie, Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,778
Default RE: This is jut for Gobbler (RE: Bush in the Guard)

Quote:
And perhaps someday Kerry will release more of his military records as well

I say that Republicans demand he sign form 180. If the Dumbocrats want to to demand answers then so should we.
__________________
Hoyt Carbon Element RKT Blackout
Axcel Armourtech HD Sights
Easton Arrows
United Bowhunters of Pa. Member
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
PABuck_HNTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2004, 05:26 AM   #5
 
Coastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dahlonega Ga. USA
Posts: 1,626
Default RE: This is jut for Gobbler (RE: Bush in the Guard)

Quote:
ORIGINAL: bob d

bump it again it is good reading
And I too will bump it up. This goes along with my post of several days ago about time spent and points pe year. Thanks for locating and posting this!
Coastie is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush designates Iran's "Revolutionary Guard" as Global Terrorists Red Lion Politics 6 08-17-2007 07:13 PM
Bush Policies Are Weakening National Guard, Governors Say johnnyBgood Politics 1 02-27-2006 09:17 AM
Memos: Bush Refused Order While in Guard gobbler afflicted Politics 10 09-10-2004 12:55 PM
Anti Bush Guard service documens FAKE!!!! DougMD Politics 6 09-10-2004 08:49 AM
Lawsuit Uncovers New Bush Guard Records gobbler afflicted Politics 54 09-09-2004 10:54 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 AM.