Quote:
ORIGINAL: DougMD
The Shiites would have come out against us if we attacked Al Sadr as he hunkered in the shrine? I would have told them to keep him out of the shrine if they didn't want it attacked, and then sent a daisy cutter onto it if he remained there. This is BS that thugs like Al Sadr can start a fight, then retreat into a safe haven because they know we won't attack certain places. War is war. If the people don't want something attacked, it is their responsibility to keep it thug free.
|
Man alive... I'm all for putting the thump on them, but a BLU-82/daisy cutter (15,000lbs of explosives for those who are curious...) for a mosque is a little bit of overkill don't ya think! <Joke>
I DO believe we need to start pressing basic LOAC (Laws of Armed Conflict) rules here. They claim to have certain *protections* that are LOAC based, then we should start using the flip side of those rules... one of which is if they use a mosque for a hiding place and conduct combat operations FROM that mosque, then that place now holds NO significant value and can be attacked.