logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2004, 09:57 AM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
DougMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gambrills Md US
Posts: 6,078
Default Another good Ann Coulter article...

Thank You For Choosing United, Mr. Bin Laden
April 14, 2004


Last week, 9/11 commissioner John Lehman revealed that "it was the policy (before 9/11) and I believe remains the policy today to fine airlines if they have more than two young Arab males in secondary questioning because that's discriminatory." Hmmm ... Is 19 more than two? Why, yes, I believe it is. So if two Jordanian cab drivers are searched before boarding a flight out of Newark, Osama bin Laden could then board that plane without being questioned. I'm no security expert, but I'm pretty sure this gives terrorists an opening for an attack.

In a sane world, Lehman's statement would have made headlines across the country the next day. But not one newspaper, magazine or TV show has mentioned that it is official government policy to prohibit searching more than two Arabs per flight.

Meanwhile, another 9/11 commissioner, the greasy Richard Ben-Veniste, claimed to be outraged that the CIA did not immediately give intelligence on 9/11 hijackers Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar to the FBI. As we now know -- or rather, I alone know because I'm the only person in America watching the 9/11 hearings -- Ben-Veniste should have asked his fellow commissioner Jamie Gorelick about that.

Books
Treason: Hardcover | Audio
Slander: Paperback | Hardcover | Audio | Large Print
High Crimes: Paperback

Sponsors
Market Watchers:
300+% Gains Through Stock Trading!
Annoy a Liberal!
Peace Through Superior Firepower shirts
SherPak Car-Top Bag
from Seattle Sports, now at Arkatents!
Spyware Removal
Free Software to remove spyware from PC
Top 10 Web Hosting
Independent Reviews of Best Web Hosting

Start Advertising Now
.


E-Mail List




In his testimony this week, John Ashcroft explained that the FBI wasn't even told Almihdhar and Alhazmi were in the country until weeks before the 9/11 attack -- because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995. The FBI wasn't allowed to put al-Qaida specialists on the hunt for Almihdhar and Alhazmi because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995. Indeed, the FBI couldn't get a warrant to search Zacarias Moussaoui's computer -- because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995.

The famed 1995 guidelines were set forth in a classified memorandum written by the then-deputy attorney general titled "Instructions for Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations," which imposed a "draconian" wall between counterintelligence and criminal investigations.

What Ashcroft said next was breathtaking. Prohibited from mounting a serious search for Almihdhar and Alhazmi, an irritated FBI investigator wrote to FBI headquarters, warning that someone would die because of these policies -- "since the biggest threat to us, OBL (Osama bin Laden), is getting the most protection."

FBI headquarters responded: "We're all frustrated with this issue. These are the rules. NSLU (National Security Law Unit) does not make them up. But somebody did make these rules. Somebody built this wall."

The person who built that wall described in the infamous 1995 memo, Ashcroft said, "is a member of the commission." If this were an episode of "Matlock," the camera would slowly pan away from Ashcroft's face at this point and then quickly jump to an extreme close-up of Jamie Gorelick's horrified expression. Armed marshals would then escort the kicking, screaming Gorelick away in leg irons as the closing credits rolled. Gorelick was the deputy attorney general in 1995.

The 9/11 commission has finally uncovered the proverbial "smoking gun"! But it was fired by one of the 9/11 commissioners. Maybe between happy reminiscences about the good old days of Ruby Ridge, Waco and the Elian Gonzales raid, Ben-Veniste could ask Gorelick about those guidelines. Democrats think it's a conflict of interest for Justice Scalia to have his name in the same phonebook as Dick Cheney. But there is no conflict of interest having Gorelick sit on a commission that should be investigating her.

Bill O'Reilly's entire summary of Ashcroft's testimony was to accuse Ashcroft of throwing sheets over naked statues rather than fighting terrorism. No mention of the damning Gorelick memo. No one knows about the FAA's No-Searching-Arabs counterterrorism policy. Predictions that conservatives have finally broken through the wall of sound coming from the mainstream media may have been premature.

When Democrats make an accusation against Republicans, newspaper headlines repeat the accusation as a fact: "U.S. Law Chief 'Failed to Heed Terror Warnings,'" "Bush Was Told of Qaida Steps Pre-9/ 11; Secret Memo Released," "Bush White House Said to Have Failed to Make al-Qaida an Early Priority."

But when Republicans make accusations against Democrats -- even accusations backed up by the hard fact of a declassified Jamie Gorelick memo -- the headlines note only that Republicans are making accusations: "Ashcroft Lays Blame at Clinton's Feet," "Ashcroft: Blame Bubba for 9/11," "Ashcroft Faults Clinton in 9/11 Failures."

It's amazing how consistent it is. A classic of the genre was the Chicago Tribune headline, which managed to use both constructs in a single headline: "Ashcroft Ignored Terrorism, Panel Told; Attorney General Denies Charges, Blames Clinton." Why not: "Reno Ignored Terrorism, Panel Told; Former Deputy Attorney General Denies Charges, Blames Bush"?

Democrats actively created policies that were designed to hamstring terrorism investigations. The only rap against the Bush administration is that it failed to unravel the entire 9/11 terrorism plot based on a memo titled: "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."

I have news for liberals: Bin Laden is still determined to attack inside the United States! Could they please tell us when and where the next attack will be? Because unless we know that, it's going to be difficult to stop it if we can't search Arabs.

return
DougMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 10:16 AM   #2
Super Moderator
 
Cougar Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southeast Central Illinois USA
Posts: 6,960
Default RE: Another good Ann Coulter article...

Ann Coulter is very good at pointing fingers and giving advice. The problem is.............she NEVER has any solutions. She should keep her pretty little mouth shut unless she has something constructive to say.
Cougar Mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 10:23 AM   #3
Giant Nontypical
 
DougMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gambrills Md US
Posts: 6,078
Default RE: Another good Ann Coulter article...

I think what she is saying is that the 9/11 Commission looking into 9/11 has uncovered the reason for Al Qaeda getting away with 9/11, our hands were tied with policy set forth in the previous administration by the deputy attorney general in 1995. She is also saying it should be ok to question several Arab people from a single flight if the situation warrants.

Problem: Who is to blame for 911. SOLUTION: The 1995 policy laid out in the Gorelick memo.

Problem: If more than two Arab people board a plane, terrorists can attack again because from the third person on they won't get searched per discrimination policy. SOLUTION: Let us search however many people the situation warrants to ensure our safety.

She gives solutions, they are merely IMPLICIT...
DougMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 08:05 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Snyder County PA USA
Posts: 425
Default RE: Another good Ann Coulter article...

Quote:
She gives solutions, they are merely IMPLICIT
Quite correct sir!!

Who needs the solutions spelled out when they are not only staring you in the face but also smacking ya' upside the head with a 10 lb. sledge!!
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one pretty and well preserved package, but to skid across the line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, yelling GERONIMO!!!!!
Country Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 08:32 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eagles Landing, KS
Posts: 612
Default RE: Another good Ann Coulter article...

IMO this "non-partisan panel" will find out things they wish had gone un-said. The largest amount of blame can be laid at the Klinton administrations feet.
They want to lay blame only if Bush is at the toop of the list.
But when it is all said and done, we don't need this BS panel to tell us what we need to do to protect the country. There are smarter people already in place to do that.
aunsaber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2004, 12:15 PM   #6
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Goose Creek SC
Posts: 1,097
Default RE: Another good Ann Coulter article...

Quote:
Ann Coulter is very good at pointing fingers and giving advice. The problem is.............she NEVER has any solutions. She should keep her pretty little mouth shut unless she has something constructive to say.
Cougar,

Surely you don't mean that! All the lady is doing is stating the facts!! Facts that are being ignored by the 9/11 Commission and the main stream liberal press!!

She didn't state it, But Ms. Gorelick's boss, Ms Reno, acknowledged under sworn testimony to the 9/11 Commission that she didn't pass on to her successor any information pertaining to Al Queda!! Oh, I guess she assummed Mr. Clarke would take care of that! Albeit he worked for the NSA and that prevented him, by Ms Gorelick's mandates under her 1995 directive, from being able to do so!! All of the pieces of the puzzle are there as to what happened, but the 9/11 Commission is not looking at them. They are trying to find a silver bullet to shoot President Bush with!!

Bill
__________________
Praise the Lord, He is worthy
lamb1647 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good Coulter article on liberals and oil/gas DougMD Politics 39 06-30-2008 08:08 PM
Excellent Article by Ann Coulter on Democrats' double standard DougMD Politics 20 03-12-2007 12:42 PM
Good Article Germ Bowhunting 23 02-06-2007 05:21 PM
Good WHA article Justin Bowhunting 66 08-23-2006 04:43 PM
Hilariously good article fng Politics 2 01-09-2004 06:21 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.