And from bondage to.... spiritual faith maybe?
As Coastie said we are not a democracy... I can't stand it when people say we are. I do not share his optimism however. We are well down the path of destruction. We are somewhere between these two stages I believe.
>From complacency to apathy;
>From apathy to dependence;
Our founders knew democracy would lead to the pit falls mentioned previously. You do not want democracy... majority rule. They used to call it
democratic despotism.
As our federal powers have increased to an unbalanced level (not
checked enough by the states) and our elected officials rule by polls, and bend to the will of the people...(to get elected again) and not by principle nor the constitution, have we not
in effect become a democracy?
The following an excerpt from
Federalist paper #10
The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection
It is in vain to say that enlightened statesmen will be able to adjust these clashing interests, and render them all subservient to the public good. Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. Nor, in many cases, can such an adjustment be made at all without taking into view indirect and remote considerations, which will rarely prevail over the immediate interest which one party may find in disregarding the rights of another or the good of the whole. The inference to which we are brought is, that the CAUSES of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its EFFECTS.
I say we have eroded the controls put into place by our wise founders and now are
effectually operating as a democracy. And factions are ruling our country. The factions are continually fighting for that rule. Thus the partisan politics we see today.
A democratic despotism is like a theocracy: it assumes its own correctness.
Walter Bagehot
Sound familiar? Like political correctness?