logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2004, 07:04 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 632
Default Gay Weddings

I personally don't agree with gay's getting married, I don't think that it is right, but what somebody does in their own home is their business. Could someone please explain to me why we should care if they get married or not. I'm confused. Is it going to cost me more money in medical insurance cost's? Am I going to have to pay more taxes because gays want to get married? Or is all the hype just because some people may not want to see this in public?
Popere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2004, 09:01 AM   #2
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,547
Default RE: Gay Weddings

I disagree with the concept too Popere ,
and the answer to all of your other questions is yes .

They'll want all of the same job bennies , which raises costs for the businesses , which all of us will have to pay . 40% of what you pay for a new car is already employee bennies , now imagine it being more like 60% . Your new Ford just got a lot more expensive .

They'll want all of the same tax breaks , so that means less revenue for Uncle Sam and the states , which the rest of us will have to make up . Just watch your tax bracket change to a higher one to make up for the shortfall . Remember , these sodomites won't be paying the higher single rate anymore .

Imagine millions of new married couples entering the monetary system . That's the only way that they won't be different from the rest of us , and we'll all have to pay out more because of it .
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
kevin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2004, 09:20 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,602
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2004, 09:30 AM   #4
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 632
Default RE: Gay Weddings

I guess I'm still confused. Because like Hip said if they were straight and marrying the opposite sex would it not be the same thing?
Popere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 07:50 AM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ......
Posts: 3,644
Default RE: Gay Weddings

Popere - do you see a problem with 2 heterosexual males or heterosexual females marrying ? How about interespecies marriage ? How about 3 people marrying each other ? How about brothers marrying sisters ?
stealthycat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 07:51 AM   #6
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,547
Default RE: Gay Weddings

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Popere

I guess I'm still confused. Because like Hip said if they were straight and marrying the opposite sex would it not be the same thing?
Hip and Popere ,
the problem is the number of additional marriages , not the gender of the spouses . Popere asked what additional costs might be faced if gays were allowed to marry . Adding millions of "additional" married couples will increase the cost to society as a whole . Straight marriages would only add the same millions over a period of years or even decades , gays will thrust that burden on us all at once . With an estimated 10% of the US population being gay , conservative IMO , that transltes to 18,000,000 new couples , and the associated bennies and tax breaks .

Both of you asked what difference it would make whether they were gay or straight . Are either of you married to or living with a lover of the same gender ? If not , it would be difficult to see the other side's POV . If so , Eeeewwww !!!!!
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
kevin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 09:36 AM   #7
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 632
Default RE: Gay Weddings

You obviously did not read the first line of my post. To answer your question Kevin1 I am a straight man married to the most beautiful woman in the world. I do see your point about that many couples becoming married at once. Is that the only issue about these people getting married that you have? Does anyone else have any other issues with this? I do not agree with gay weddings at all. I am just trying to understand all the hype.
Popere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 09:53 AM   #8
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,547
Default RE: Gay Weddings

Fair enough Popere ,
I reread all of your posts this time . Aside from the fact that I object to Adam & Steve perverting what most folks consider a sacred institution , and the resultant cost to society , I feel that they have zero right for their whiny minority to force their objectionable lifestyle on the rest of us as being just as normal as we are .

They aren't normal , if they were we'd all wake up with a funny taste in our mouths each morning . Look up the definition of the word normal , homosexuality don't even come close . Nobody is holding a gun to their head and demanding that they engage in disgusting perversion , it is a choice they made whether they admit it or not . Stealthycat , cover your eyes:

Nobody ever swallowed a load by accident !
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
kevin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 09:57 AM   #9
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 632
Default RE: Gay Weddings

That's what I'm looking for Kevin1. Now your on track. Keep it coming.
Popere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 10:03 AM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ......
Posts: 3,644
Default RE: Gay Weddings

Popere - Its illegal for EVERYONE to be same sexed married. There is no violation of Rights , none of can do it.

Like has been said before, if marriage isn't between a man and woman, if that definition is removed, you should fully expect to see man/man marriages, women/women, man/dog, man/boy, woman/boy, woman/dog, woman/woman/man, man/man/man etc etc etc marriages.

Right ?
stealthycat is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 PM.