I was wondering what your opinions were on this film?? I felt this documentory really misrepresented the gun-owners but was interesting. I felt Charlton Heston could have come up with better answers to the questions he was asked near the end of the film.
__________________
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
The film was made by Michael Moore, a left wing extremist hell bent on banning guns. Charleton Heston did a horrible job in the interview, wish that disgusting human Moore would have interviewed the Nuge, he would have ripped him a new one!
The film does not in any way represent gun owners, and there was not one viable argument in this worthless piece of sh!t film. Everyone was sad about the school shootings, but who is to blame? Gun owners? The NRA? How are they the ones to blame. This guy is living in Hollywood, where nothing is really real. I personally hope he moves to another country where being an obese, left wing, disgusting, vile human being is acceptable, because that country sure isn't this one.
Bowling for Columbine is a propoganda piece, no more. Moore manipulates the facts to make them say things that they don't say. At first viewing, it is provacative and interesting. Upon further review and study, it is a steaming pile of poopy.
Wonder what Micheal Moore thinks of a gun registry that has wasted billions of tax payers dollars. Our province in Saskatchewan can't even afford an M.I.R unit for the ill but can dump millions in a gun registry that has not helped solve one crime or decrease the amount of shooting in Canada. I don't who is more stupid Micheal Moore or the Liberal government of Canada.
__________________
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Iv'e read and listen to alot of complaints over this movie, so a few months ago I broke down and rented it to see what the hoopla was all about. After watching it I have no idea what 90% of the bitching was all about. I get the arguement about him switching stuff around as far as dates and things that the NRA & Charles were saying, but that really just makes it a non-documentry.
The movie never came close to being a "lets ban guns" movie
__________________
Caution - Some posts may contain sarcasim
I'm gonna go into the bathroom and vomit now...[X(]
__________________
πνεύμα γ*μισα
"Error never shows itself in its naked reality in order not to be discovered. On the contrary, it dresses elegantly, so that the unwary may be led to believe that it is more truthful than truth itself."
-Irenaeus of Lyon
I wouldn't give Michael Moore the satisfaction of me watching it. I hear enough about it on the talking head shows to know its Crap!
__________________
Hoyt Carbon Element RKT Blackout
Axcel Armourtech HD Sights
Easton Arrows
United Bowhunters of Pa. Member
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Charleton Heston did a horrible job in the interview, wish that disgusting human Moore would have interviewed the Nuge, he would have ripped him a new one!
It wouldn't have mattered who he interviewed, Michael Moore is a master of film editing to make people look like villains.
__________________
Obamanfreude - 1. taking pleasure from the misfortunes of an Obama supporter as he or she is adversely affected by the policies of their Dear Leader.
I haven't seen the movie and i dont't plan to. I knew a girl who went that school and was there during the shooting. She wasn't hurt but one of the victims was a friend of hers.[:'(]
__________________
Proud Daddy of Mini Red Hawk
Master of the Poof-B-Gone Pen
Charleton Heston did a horrible job in the interview, wish that disgusting human Moore would have interviewed the Nuge, he would have ripped him a new one!
It wouldn't have mattered who he interviewed, Michael Moore is a master of film editing to make people look like villains.
Exactly.
Heston, in reality, could have given a good interview, but Moore just cut, manipulated and kept what he wanted. Making everything and everyone say what he wanted to portray. Creating his perception of reality.