Interesting , but it's ( the text) not real clear on all the laws that apply.
I have no knowledge of what they do in TX but in WI, wild deer are the property of the State. There are deer farms where the deer are handle in, I would believe, a matter like live stock. Much like the pay to shot fenced in areas where guy pay to kill a deer. They are strickly regulated and controlled by the state. If one some how gets out of the encloser, the state is notified and the deer if possible is tracted down and either capture or killed.
With in the fenced in area it wouldn't make much difference if they were killing a free ranging cow in that same encloser, live stock is live stock once penned up. The difference would be the origin of the animal, how it was obtianed and from were it was obtained, what permits and licensing is required by the state.
A friend of mine raises deer in WI and before CWD, he sold them to people in TX and other southern states where the deer are so small. They were usually used for breeding stock, not pay to kill animals.
I don't understand how someone can tell you, you can not fence in your property. These deer are not migratory so one isn't interferring in such natural movement to any great degree. They are not driving or rounding up the deer then enclosing them, they were on private property which was then fenced in , correct?
__________________
Now you have to picture a combination of PeeWEE Herman and Wally Cox but with less muscle tone, trying to be intimidating None of this is funny! Message edited by Cougar Mag -- 1/7/2005 1:16:42 AM >/b]
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,186
RE: Who owns the deer?
Quote:
I don't understand how someone can tell you, you can not fence in your property. These deer are not migratory so one isn't interferring in such natural movement to any great degree. They are not driving or rounding up the deer then enclosing them, they were on private property which was then fenced in , correct?
Well put.
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.
"This would be unlawful taking of their personal property without compensation," attorney Richard Sommer, who represents the plaintiffs, was quoted in Wednesday's San Antonio Express-News.
first they want them removed, then they want compensated for the removal the deer. sound like a bunch of greedy scum.
they do not own the deer, nor does anyone else. it is my personal opinion that no one should prosper financially from wild game whether they have been fenced up or not, it is wrong.
The way I hear it the fences in Texas aint worth a flip anyone, can't keep anything out, can't keep anything in .... the laws probably won't matter anyway
The way I hear it the fences in Texas aint worth a flip anyone, can't keep anything out, can't keep anything in .... the laws probably won't matter anyway
I pretty much expect blather of this sort. Very mature. An expected response.[:'(]
[Deleted]
