logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2003, 05:52 AM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Missouri USA
Posts: 5,420
Default The 9th. circus does it again.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is once again up to its political shenanigans. A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based court recently reinstated a wrongful death lawsuit against the gun industry, that had been previously tossed out by a Los Angeles federal judge before it went to trial. The suit, Ileto v. Glock, seeks to blame Glock and others for the horrendous criminal actions of deranged white supremacist Buford Furrow. In 1999, Furrow shot and killed postal worker Joseph Ileto, and wounded three children at a Jewish day care center in California. What is not often reported is that, while a Glock pistol was used in Furrow`s heinous crime, the gun was originally sold to a police department, which subsequently sold it to a licensed dealer, who in turn sold it to a collector, who finally sold it to Furrow.

Commenting on the case, Glock attorney Christopher Renzullie asked the obvious question, "How are we supposed to monitor a gun after we sell it to a law enforcement agency?" Echoing this frustrated sentiment, UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh quipped, "According to the Ninth Circuit, Glock has to dictate to the police how to handle [gun sales], because they would know better than the police how to prevent crime."

The only glimmer of rational and equitable reasoning to come out of the reinstatement case came in the form of a well-reasoned dissent by Senior Judge Cynthia Hall. "I understand the majority`s desire to ensure that the appellants have their day in court," Hall wrote. "But I do not concur in the majority`s opinion because I believe that it runs afoul of some of our most basic duties as federal judges....[we] are required to apply state law whether we agree with it or not."

This case dramatically underscores the urgent need for passage of S. 659/S. 1806, the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act."

The House version of this bill? H.R. 1036?was passed last April by an overwhelming vote of 285-140, and has the support of the White House.

Yet, despite assurances of a timely vote and broad bipartisan support, S. 659/S. 1806 has become stalled in the Senate. Thanks to the dedicated grassroots efforts of millions of NRA members and gun owners across the country, S. 659/S. 1806 is now widely acknowledged as having enough votes to overcome a filibuster by anti-gun Senators. But we can`t stop a filibuster until one starts, and the process can`t begin until the bill reaches the Senate floor for debate.

On November 6, pro-gun leaders in the Senate attempted to bring the bill to the floor with a proposed "consent agreement" to govern the length of debate and the number of amendments each side could order. Anti-gun Senators sent their representative to the floor to object. After much discussion, and failing to gain "consent," Senate leaders moved to other business, but vowed to bring S. 659/S. 1806 to a vote early next year, without regard to the objections from the anti-gun corps. That sets us up for a full-blown brawl in the new year.

In the end, it all boils down to politics, but you can help break the logjam. In the coming weeks, your Senators will likely be traveling around your state, holding town hall meetings, where they can report on what they`ve been doing in Washington, and take questions from their constituents. These meetings offer a tremendous opportunity for you to personally voice your strong support for S. 659/S. 1806. Your Senators need to know that this bill is about saving jobs and protecting our rights. If you can`t attend a meeting, send a letter, an e-mail, or make a phone call to your Senators` offices. Tell them it`s time to stop playing politics with the Second Amendment. Urge them to fully support S. 659/S. 1806 without any anti-gun amendments! Ask them to do everything in their power to end these meritless lawsuits and ensure that this essential legislation is approved as written. Tell them it`s time to pass S. 659/S. 1806! Make no mistake?with your help, we will win this fight and see this critical legislation signed into law.

In addition, please contact your Senators and your U.S. Representative and urge them to cosponsor and support S. 1414 and H.R. 3193?the Senate and House versions of the "District of Columbia Personal Protection Act." This important legislation seeks to restore the constitutionally-guaranteed Second Amendment rights of the residents of the District of Columbia, which has once again reclaimed the title of "murder capital" of the United States.

Finally, please continue to urge your U.S. Representative and Senators to oppose current legislation seeking to expand the 1994 Clinton gun ban?H.R. 2038, S. 1431, and S. 1034. You can find contact information for your elected officials by using the "Write Your Representatives" tool at www.NRAILA.org, or you can call your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121 and your U.S. Representative at (202) 225-3121.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is rediculous, If Glock is guilty then every manufacturing company in the world is guilty, Something has got to be done about these rogue judges.
__________________
THE NRA, WHERE WOULD YOU AS A GUN-OWNER BE WITHOUT THEM.
GUN-OWNERS, UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL.
strut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2003, 09:47 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
Posts: 582
Default RE: The 9th. circus does it again.

These judges have got to be dealt with. I am so sick and tired of sensible legislation being picked apart by some judge, especially one from the ninth circuit!! I mean, who do these people think they are? Someone, tell me where in the innumerated powers of the Constitution, or even implied powers, does it say that the judges make policy? Oh, but that wouldn't matter to the Dems, because our Consitution means about as much to them as family values do; very little.
__________________
God bless!
BigBore1895 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2003, 12:49 AM   #3
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: El Dorado County California USA
Posts: 8,753
Default RE: The 9th. circus does it again.

CIRCUS court of appeals is about right. They are the single most overturned appeals court in our country and have made some of the goofiest rulings in this country. All of these clowns need to be retired and then start over with some people who actually have common sense, let alone intelligence.
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.

If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
CalHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flu Shot Circus cardeer Politics 26 10-21-2004 03:19 AM
The 9th. circus court strut Politics 9 03-02-2003 11:53 AM
Antis Asking For Your Help in Circus Poll Otto Politics 1 12-10-2002 09:00 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 PM.