Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
As much as I think Newt would tear Obama a new one in a debate, he has too many skeletons to hide. He also has to deal with all the smack talking he did about Reagan.
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.
As much as I think Newt would tear Obama a new one in a debate, he has too many skeletons to hide. He also has to deal with all the smack talking he did about Reagan.
No doubt in my mind, that Newt would slice and dice him in a debate.
__________________
Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish
You mean the Republican establishment--the same ones that gave us McCain, and would like to give us Romney.
I'm a Conservative, and not the least bit afraid of Newt. I don't want someone who's goal is to "reach across party lines". I want a POTUS that knows what he is doing, and won't compromise getting the job done. Newt wasn't my first pick, but he's my pick now.
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt
A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2
The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats
Here's an interesting article written by Palin that is posted on Drudge.com of all places. The link goes to the entire article which is well worth reading. One of her specific points is about the Republican establishment trying to control the selection process. She makes a valid point. I recommend reading the entire article as it presents a lot to think about.
Quote:
But this whole thing isn’t really about Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney. It is about the GOP establishment vs. the Tea Party grassroots and independent Americans who are sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives with a complicit media egging it on. In fact, the establishment has been just as dismissive of Ron Paul and Rick Santorum. Newt is an imperfect vessel for Tea Party support, but in South Carolina the Tea Party chose to get behind him instead of the old guard’s choice.
In response, the GOP establishment voices denounced South Carolinian voters with the same vitriol we usually see from the left when they spew hatred at everyday Americans “bitterly clinging” to their faith and their Second Amendment rights. The Tea Party was once again told to sit down and shut up and listen to the “wisdom” of their betters. We were reminded of the litany of Tea Party endorsed candidates in 2010 who didn’t win. Well, here’s a little newsflash to the establishment: without the Tea Party there would have been no historic 2010 victory at all.
....partial quote from article...
Here's an interesting article written by Palin that is posted on Drudge.com of all places. The link goes to the entire article which is well worth reading. One of her specific points is about the Republican establishment trying to control the selection process. She makes a valid point. I recommend reading the entire article as it presents a lot to think about.
Attacks on Gingrich are rampant..
