republicans are always talking of being attacked by other countries, wars, etc...
they talk a big game in debates with democrats, but I don't see democrats worrying about being attacked etc...
I guess Dems know Dems keep us safe and being afraid doesn't help anything.
not to mention repubs couldn't keep us safe from 9/11 happening.
Plain and simple, grow a pair and quit worrying about being attacked, and vote Dem if you want to stay safe in the first place.
Democrats kill terrorists(bin laden), Republicans let terrorists kill us(bin laden).
"Neither party" is scared,that's the smoke screen that allows them the freedom to put us in the toilet even further than we presently are.scare tactics by both parties a common in politics.
__________________
Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish
republicans are always talking of being attacked by other countries, wars, etc...
they talk a big game in debates with democrats, but I don't see democrats worrying about being attacked etc...
I guess Dems know Dems keep us safe and being afraid doesn't help anything.
not to mention repubs couldn't keep us safe from 9/11 happening.
Plain and simple, grow a pair and quit worrying about being attacked, and vote Dem if you want to stay safe in the first place.
Democrats kill terrorists(bin laden), Republicans let terrorists kill us(bin laden).
Really, remember 911? what have you been smoking?
You are the reason I joined the Rangers, I didn't want to fight along side of someone that was a puss!
Really, remember 911? what have you been smoking?
You are the reason I joined the Rangers, I didn't want to fight along side of someone that was a puss!
Wait a second there. My husband was not in the Rangers and he is definitely not a puss.
__________________
Proud parents of our own "Daddy's Little Girls"
I heard Jesus He drank wine and I bet we'd get along just fine.
I met a lot of soldiers in my four years active and 12 years reserve that were stand up troopers, however I did meet some that were a big puss, but I never met a Ranger that was! That's what I meant to say.
I sure didn't mean to say that if you weren't a Ranger you were a puss!
Proud to have worn that BERET, it was earned not issued!
My, Sal can sure disconnect the facts from their contexts....
1979 was a particularly bad year for one Democrat. He presided not only over the sellout of a longtime Persian Gulf ally (although arguably one who could have done some reforming), fueling the ascension to power of the Ayatollahs, leading to their brazen attack on the US Diplomatic mission in Iran, not to mention allowing himself to be so sidelined that an emboldened Soviet Union stormed into Afghanistan.
1993 was another bad year for another Democrat. Inheriting a humanitarian mission, he turned it into something it wasn't intended to be, resulting in images of dead U.S. Servicemen on TV being dragged through the streets of the "Mog'" and ultimately leading to an embarrasing episode of tucking our tails between our legs, in turn emboldening one product of an earlier Democrat's inaction (Saudi-turned-Afghan-Jihadi Osama bin Laden) into believing that he could get away with things like ... Well, let's just see here.... How about bombing U.S. embassies abroad? How about a well-meaning but unsuccessful truck bomb attack on the WTC? Attacking a U.S. warship while in a foreign port? Inciting disillusioned Arab twenty-somethings into learning how to fly (but not land) airliners? While that particular Democratic President did actually lob a few cruise missiles into Afghanistan and bombed a few suspected WMD sites in another country (and the naive ones here would believe that Bush II's intel was bad?), most of what was achieved served primarily to divert media attention away from a certain stain on a certain dress.
And, now we find ourselves at odds with the Ayatollahs yet again? How does this happen, anyway? They run the country of Lebanon by proxy through Hezbollah, fool around in Iraq by way of Ayatollah-wanna-be Moqtada al Sadr, and poke at Israel by proxy through Hamas? Now some say they're arming and fueling Assad's thugs as they run their own version of "Anfal"? What the heck else is next?
No, I think I'd have to say that the Democrats have done a pretty artful job of trashing our own country so badly in general that we can't keep track of what's going on around us elsewhere. And, while we're not paying attention, the people who would destroy us get the drop on us.
Credit where credit is due. Democratic administrations are just plain bad for this country.
Last edited by homers brother; 01-23-2012 at 08:30 PM.
My, Sal can sure disconnect the facts from their contexts....
1979 was a particularly bad year for one Democrat. He presided not only over the sellout of a longtime Persian Gulf ally (although arguably one who could have done some reforming), fueling the ascension to power of the Ayatollahs, leading to their brazen attack on the US Diplomatic mission in Iran, not to mention allowing himself to be so sidelined that an emboldened Soviet Union stormed into Afghanistan.
1993 was another bad year for another Democrat. Inheriting a humanitarian mission, he turned it into something it wasn't intended to be, resulting in images of dead U.S. Servicemen on TV being dragged through the streets of the "Mog'" and ultimately leading to an ambarrasing episode of tucking our tails between our legs, in turn emboldening one product of an earlier Democrat's inaction (Osama bin Laden) into believing that he could get away with things like ... Well, let's just see here.... How about bombing U.S. embassies abroad? Attacking a U.S. warship while in a foreign port? Inciting disillusioned Arab twenty-somethings into learning how to fly (but not land) airliners? While that particular Democratic President did actually lob a few cruise missiles and bombed a few suspected WMD sites in another country (and the naive ones here would believe that Bush II's intel was bad?), most of what was achieved served primarily to divert media attention away from a certain stain on a certain dress.
And, now we find ourselves at odds with the Ayatollahs yet again? How does this happen, anyway? They run the countries of Lebanon by proxy through Hezbollah, and poke at Israel by proxy through Hamas? Now some say they're arming and fueling Assad's thugs as they run their own version of "Anfal"? What the heck else is next?
No, I think I'd have to say that the Democrats have done a pretty artful job of trashing our own country so badly in general that we can't keep track of what's going on around us elsewhere. And, while we're not paying attention, the people who would destroy us get the drop on us.
Credit where credit is due. Democratic administrations are just plain bad for this country.
DOH ! heeheh....good post. Hell we can go all the way back as far as you care to go and see that the worst pukes in history were demokrats....Woodrow Wilson, progressive skunk put is into WWI....FDR, the commie-lovin' progressive puke took us into WWII, Truman put us in Korea, LBJ who got us into Vietnam, Carter who set up Iran as the Ayatolla-crappa-hole-a, Klinton put us in a downed blackhawk in Mogadishu and now Butt-monkey Barry playing all sorts of games in the middle east. You are SO right about demokrat administrations. They are bad for the country, no matter how you look at it.
With an a answer like that it's easy to see what tax bracket you are in, and easy to see you don't own your own business, but punch a time clock or on the welfare roles.