Wow--you mean you found someone's ex-wife and they had something less than flattering to say about them? Who woulda' thunk it? I thought ex-wives all had the same opinion of their former husbands...
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt
A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2
The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats
Wow--you mean you found someone's ex-wife and they had something less than flattering to say about them? Who woulda' thunk it? I thought ex-wives all had the same opinion of their former husbands...
Read on a forum where a few said something about an arms deal on Drudge, but it's no longer up there. Don't know how credible that is.
Whatever it is, they're trying to make it big.
According to articles, it should be spilled tomorrow.
I guess this is part of the vetting process that everybody seems to think is needed. It's too bad the media doesn't treat all candidates equally in this regard, including Obama. What's even worse is the media never seems to showcase the ideas or proposals each candidate has or to provide a thorough analysis of them. Regardless of which candidate(s) are selected, at least the best ideas could gain a wider audience and hopefully be implemented.
Ex-wives can offer useful information, just like everybody else. The problem is that the media will likely not closely examine the ex-wife's motive (likely not altruistic) nor closely examine the claims for veracity or accuracy. These media faults aren't just limited to ex-wives--they include pretty much everybody who likes to drag somebody else through the mud. People want to ehar about the dirt but rarely want to verify it or assess its' accuracy or truthfulness.
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.
If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
I guess this is part of the vetting process that everybody seems to think is needed. It's too bad the media doesn't treat all candidates equally in this regard, including Obama. What's even worse is the media never seems to showcase the ideas or proposals each candidate has or to provide a thorough analysis of them. Regardless of which candidate(s) are selected, at least the best ideas could gain a wider audience and hopefully be implemented.
Ex-wives can offer useful information, just like everybody else. The problem is that the media will likely not closely examine the ex-wife's motive (likely not altruistic) nor closely examine the claims for veracity or accuracy. These media faults aren't just limited to ex-wives--they include pretty much everybody who likes to drag somebody else through the mud. People want to ehar about the dirt but rarely want to verify it or assess its' accuracy or truthfulness.
I think Obama gets treated the best by the media, but it's not that big of a difference over the Republican candidates. They're all establishment candidates except Paul.
Jon Stewart a few times exposed the blatant media bias. Again, it's so blatant.
Besides the media, Republicans have one advantage over Obama: the neocon filth coming from Levin, Hannity, Orly, and others.
It's hilarious watching Levin go ballistic over Paul. This is where much of the misinformation about Paul comes from e.g. blaming America, wants Iran to get a nuke, unelectable, etc.
1: the EX wife is critical...yes....the only morons who'd be surprised by this, are the
demokratz. She's looking for her 15 minutes and the demo-scum will serve it up
on a silver platter. I doubt that it will be seen as anything other than a money
grubbing scheme by TWO opportunists looking for personal enrichment at the
expense of Newt Gingrich.....
2: Demokrats are true pieces of crap, hypocrites, and vermin. During the Klinton
impeachment hearings, it was being touted by all the mental pygmies out there
(demokratz, all), that 'personal life' does not matter, is private, and should stay
that way. I guess that only applies to demo-scum who get their hands caught in
the 'cookie jar'....
3: looks like Romney LOST Ohio, TOOK New Hampshire, and is quite possibly on a
losing track in S.Carolina. The biggest fear the demo-scum have, is a Gingrich
candidacy in light of the fact he is sufficiently intellectually endowed as to be able
to retain historical facts, apply them to a debate, and to consider a teleprompter as
unnecessary. He will wipe the floor with Bumblin' Barry the commie muslim
demokrat in ANY debate, and make him look like 'Simple Simon' in front of the
entire world. This will be OBAMA's vetting...
I do not see this as anything other than a minor bump in the road for Gingrich.
Of course, I could be wrong...I tend to consistently over-estimate the intelligence and character of Americans...
Newt is Newtered by Ex
I thought ex-wives all had the same opinion of their former husbands...
