Seriously, we need to stop worrying about the PC crap. If this is really true, wins of war. These guys owned them and should fully mark their teritory! Question, does the mating bitch not want to be with the dominate male?
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
and that means what? It's war not hopscotch. When it comes down to it, the folks who are on the frontline need just a little bit of leaway.
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
Well I think it's better'n teeth, ears and scalps anyway. Pee on the pukes. It'll clean em up a bit...might make 'em smell better too. I am personally a proponent of post-mortem decapitation and the public display of staked heads along the roads they travel.
But then again...that's just me... Crazy wacky guy that I am, I just think it's normal to treat an enemy like he is in fact, an enemy.
By the way, that much ballyhooed ex-military man and released POW John McCain has issued some public remarks critical of these heroes' behavior...tsk tsk tsk.....
The ***anese soldiers did what their culture demanded of them. Bushido, as I understand it, bestows great shame upon the defeated and to surrender is a dishonor above all others...this is what the troops practiced in their conduct of the war. Not to excuse the barbarism, but there was a 'code of conduct' in play here which was strictly adhered to. That being said, I do not remember reading accounts of ***anese soldiers mutilating corpses (I'm certain it happened...but as an aberration, not an accepted method of treatment)... and we've all seen what the dirt monkeys did to dead U.S. service personnel. Why do we 'kow-tow' to these scumbags ? Would it be more respectful to bulldoze a trench, lye 'em up and then bury them ? How about piling them up, dousing their dead with gasolene and lightin' 'em up ? Booby trap the dead so they can kill those who come for them ? All gross representations to be sure... Where's the line drawn ? Are we responding 'in kind' to unreported molestations of OUR dead by the enemy ? I can't say. All I CAN say, is that pissin' on the enemy dead does not rise to the level of 'conduct unbecoming', at least in my book. And during wartime, there are all sorts of atrocities perpetrated on humanity by all parties concerned. None of them are standard or accepted practice...all are aberrations and relatively rare....so this seems a piddlin' issue. Unless you count the demoralization factor that is realized when U.S. service personnel are held to account for such matters by their own people....while they're being killed and shot and mutilated by the peons.
it is the kind of behavior, which in this case is quite INoffensive, in which human beings engage when they are forced into an inhuman situation. War is not something that can be envisioned by one who has never experienced it. So what we have here, is a bunch of armchair quarterbacks judging some guys peeing on enemy dead, who may have lost comrades to IEDs, sniper attacks, RPG attacks, etc. Some may have been pinned down and seen buddies chopped to bits by bullets and shrapnel. As far as I'm concerned, I'll buy the beer if they're gonna pee it out on the enemy dead.