Find me 96 electoral votes for the president to lose?

salukipv1 · 01-05-2012, 10:44 PM

Obama needs to lose 96 electoral votes technically to lose the presidentcy, ie he needs 270 to win the presidentcy, he won 365 in 2008.

John Kerry got 245 in 2004 I believe...

Fieldmouse · 01-06-2012, 02:38 AM

I did that already in your other stupid thread. I posted both national and state by state. Did you allso see there announcement that they can't meet their goal of 1 billion dollars for reelection?

Ed Rollins nailed it last night. Obama is tired and looking forward to his library dedication ceremony. all along Obama has shown he wanted to do the president not be president. He loves the freebies hates the job.

bergall · 01-06-2012, 11:59 AM

well he sure as hell ain't GOOD at it !

BigBuck22 · 01-06-2012, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fieldmouse

I did that already in your other stupid thread. I posted both national and state by state. Did you allso see there announcement that they can't meet their goal of 1 billion dollars for reelection?

But the campaign has identified 57 ways to get enough electoral votes.

Quote:

Ed Rollins nailed it last night. Obama is tired and looking forward to his library dedication ceremony. all along Obama has shown he wanted to do the president not be president. He loves the freebies hates the job.

Ed Rollins said Ron Paul would win Iowa. Didn't happen.

DylanT · 01-06-2012, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBuck22

But the campaign has identified 57 ways to get enough electoral votes.

Ed Rollins said Ron Paul would win Iowa. Didn't happen.

You mean the same Ed Rollins who ran Michele Bachmann's so-called "campaign"?

LOL.

bergall · 01-06-2012, 12:49 PM

Here's one showing crap-in-a-suit at a 23vote deficit with 113 votes being tossups....
http://freedomslighthouse.net/2012-p...oral-vote-map/

Fieldmouse · 01-06-2012, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DylanT

You mean the same Ed Rollins who ran Michele Bachmann's so-called "campaign"?

LOL.

And that has what to do with that comment? Seriously, he wasn't the first to say that round about comment. Rush first said it before Obama was elected and it sure as hell has turned out to be true.

Obama loves living at the expense of others. He can't stand working for a living. His entire life has been based on handouts. Why would he want to change now?

Fieldmouse · 01-06-2012, 01:16 PM

Obama 4 years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqoFw...e_gdata_player

This week.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPJpF...e_gdata_player

He isnt up for the fight and you can tell that in his voice, his message and the quality of the video.

salukipv1 · 01-06-2012, 01:20 PM

ha ha... and the man hasn't even begun campaigning!
100 million and hasn't even started vs 32million?

which one of you said the man with the most money wins the race? sounds about right to me

"big cash edge to Obama"

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance?hp

Fieldmouse · 01-06-2012, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salukipv1

ha ha... and the man hasn't even begun campaigning!
100 million and hasn't even started vs 32million?

which one of you said the man with the most money wins the race? sounds about right to me

"big cash edge to Obama"

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance?hp

Sorry to burst your bubble. Obama has been campaigning since September and his numbers have fine down.

When it comes to money, Obama and the Dens will be out spent. Corporations will be spending millions and your union buddies wont be able to even come close. The dens are scared to death about this fact.