logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2011, 04:44 AM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comanche Co., OK
Posts: 8,889
Default Senate Votes To Reduce Direct Farm Subsidies

to millionaires. OK senator Coburn pushed a bill through the US senate that reduces direct payment farm subsidies for millionaires. The vote was 84-15. Our senator Inhofe voted against the bill: Inhofe rightly complains about out of control federal spending; then he votes against legislation reducing farm welfare payments to millionaires-go figure.

http://billingsgazette.com/news/stat...cc4c03286.html

Quote:
Voting against the $1 million income qualification cap in addition to Stabenow and Roberts were:

Sens. Max Baucus, D-Mont.; Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.; Thad Cochran, R-Miss.; Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; John Hoeven, R-N.D.; John Boozman, R-Ark.; Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.; Roy Blunt, R-Mo.; Jim Inhofe, R-Okla.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., Jerry Moran, R-Kan.; Roger Wicker, R-Miss.; and Mark Pryor, D-Ark.
falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 11:33 AM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,706
Default

Hooray! About time.
salukipv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 01:19 PM   #3
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: El Dorado County California USA
Posts: 8,753
Default

Quote:
Direct payments, the type of subsidy targeted in Friday's vote, have long been criticized because they are paid regardless of crop prices and yields, unlike other more insurance-like programs that kick in when prices drop or crops are damaged.

As lawmakers prepare for a new five-year farm bill in 2012, leaders of the House and Senate Agriculture committees are looking at getting rid of direct payments altogether, shifting some of the aid to insurance programs that cover falling prices and revenue drops.

Republicans and Democrats on the Agriculture panels have already jointly proposed cutting $23 billion from farm programs over 10 years -- almost half of the $50 billion that direct payments cost over that period. They sent the idea to the budget-cutting supercommittee, hoping to head off even greater cuts in next year's farm bill. Some lawmakers have suggested writing the entire farm bill as part of the supercommittee process.

The ag leaders have promised more details by the end of October on how they will achieve that number, but eliminating direct payments completely is a leading scenario....
It looks like they are headed in the right direction. Reducing $23 Billion or even $50 Billion over the next 10 years won't solve the deficit and spending problems completely but it will help and should be done.
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.

If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
CalHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 02:11 PM   #4
Boone & Crockett
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 17,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by salukipv1 View Post
Hooray! About time.
Did you read the article. The cap was at 1.2 million and now it's at 1 million.

I'm not sure why we pay farmers a dime. Seems to me, there might be better things to do with their property than farming. Maybe cage hunts for exotic animals or something.
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”

Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'

"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
Fieldmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2011, 02:15 PM   #5
Giant Nontypical
 
bergall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,280
Default

I never understood subsidies since after at the latest, the 1970's, most commercial farming is done by huge corporations who need to funding, underwriting, grants or subsidy. It's about time....
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
bergall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2011, 07:03 PM   #6
LBR
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 10,247
Default

Lots of it goes on here, I don't understand it. Farmers complain about how they can't make any money, but they have millions of dollars worth of equipment, drive nice trucks, have nice homes, and although many claim to be "struggling" they keep at it year after year although many have lucrative jobs along with the farm, as do their spouses.

If that's "struggling", I can't help but wonder what they would call "well off"????

At least GM got a one-time bailout.....if the crop fails, they get paid. If the crop does too well, they get paid. They get paid not to plant certain ground. If you are black and you once thought about farming, you can file a claim and get paid. The list goes on...
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt

A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2

The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats



LBR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 PM.