"Call your member of Congress," the ad concludes. "Tell them to close the loopholes that let terrorists and criminals buy guns."
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
"I just want you to know that we are working on it," Brady recalled the president telling them. "We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar."
Hmmm...a little convenient, don't ya think?...the "terrorists" spouting off the same untrue b.s. the libs spout? Sounds like Bloomberg is skinning his fellow Jew Adam Gadahn a low five under the table.
__________________
"Well if it ain't loaded and c0cked, it don't shoot." -Rooster Cogburn
The al Qaeda spokesman declares: "This is a golden opportunity. America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms. You can go down to a gun show ... and come away with a fully automatic assault rifle without a background check. ... So what are you waiting for?"
Quote:
The spot does clarify -- in small text at the end -- Gadahn's misleading assessment of the accessibility of firearms at gun shows. In fact, purchasers cannot obtain fully automatic assault rifles at those venues. Consumers can purchase semi-automatics.
No, they wouldn't try to mislead anyone, would they?*
*Well, lying doesn't really hurt when its for a good cause.
__________________
You may beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride!
Yep... This is consistent with a mathematical theorem I've been working on. It goes something like this:
Leftist = Moron
ipscshooter: I have an engineering degree and I have discovered a mathematical error in your equation. Please consider adapting the following amendation:
ipscshooter: I have an engineering degree and I have discovered a mathematical error in your equation. Please consider adapting the following amendation:
I don't see new gun control:
1: a lot of Independents are gun owners...the democrats among these will become FORMER
democrats in a hurry.
2: executive orders will be rescinded in 2012 once the republican president-elect is sworn in
3: no Gun Control legislation will get thru the Republican-led House of Representatives.
2: executive orders will be rescinded in 2012 once the republican president-elect is sworn in
Don't bet on it. i'm still waiting for Bush II to rescind the Clinton, Bush 1 and Reagan gun control orders. Yep, Ronald Reagan, the so called "Gunowners Friend"; was the first to apply the "sporting purposes" clause of the 1968 GCA to long guns.
Well, I was hoping I was right. Seriously tho', I would think that we now have a different face on the republican party; they may be more amenable to the rescinding of odious 'presidential proclamations' as infringements. I see the increased influence of the Tea Party as being the key motivator of such efforts....I could be wrong, certainly, the historical record bears out your account....
More gun control around the corner??????
