Wake Up Washington State-WildSky Progresses

[summit daWg]

Wednesday July 23 the US senate energy and natural resources committee unanimously approved the wild sky wilderness area in Snohomish county.This is also expected to pass the full senate leaving the US house of representatives as its only obsticle-THANK GOD it' s a formidable one! This is where it died last year in committee,and with luck-will again! But it doesn' t happen on it' s own! We need help here-write your congressmen(women) and tell them what you think of the American people being locked OUT of thier OWN lands! Wilderness designation is not helping the area of Farewell Creek (appropriate name) right now from burning (60,000 acres).
If these greenies get thier way they will tear out over 30 miles of established roads,culverts,(some up to 10' diameter)bridges and such at YOUR EXPENSE so that then this area Can then burn without acess to fight fires just as the Farewell creek complex is now!
This area needs to be designated Backcountry Recreation . If you don' t know what that means,go to the website of the Blue Ribbon Coalition and they will explain it to you-ACCESS to the public ,as it has always been-but NO commercial logging,or mining-much better for ALL! Now remember BLUE RIBBON COALITION.Check it out
Now I want to see what you hunters(especially Washington)are all about-what your really made of!

[summit daWg]

Bush gay? Fuming? Metrosexuals? Clintoon trading cards? Nowonder I' m talking to myself here?[X(][X(]
While Fareweell creek Wilderness BURNS toward Canada,and the Loomis state forest(At least there are roads there)And the Greenies plan to make the N. fork of the Skykomish river as inaccessable to firefighting as the Paseyton is-and what are we all discussing?[X(][X(]

[fng]

The issue of " government owned land" has always irritated the hell out of me.

they do not have the constitutional authority to " own" any land. As a matter of fact, if the fed buys land, YOU have effectivelypurchased the land so should have virtually unlimited access to it.

[summit daWg]

Thanks for the reply FNG I was really starting to think that NOBODY cares. If you or anyone else cares enough to try to help this cause-send an email to
edsapples@msn.com
and he can fix you up with info regarding this thing.Ialready havemost of it,but can' t figure out how to attach the files,and when I try to paste them-the reply screen dissappears! DAMN!I guess you could also email me,since I have NO problem attaching them to e-mails.


GO DAWGS-GoGilbeee-GO AWAY RICK!

[summit daWg]

recieved this message by email today:


Passed unanimously by 39th District GOP,August 5,2003

A Resolution Pertaining to Wild Sky Wilderness Area

Be it resolved, that the 39th Legislative District Republican Committee
opposes the Wild Sky Wilderness Area Act of 2003 and authorizes the 39th
District Director and Executive Board to issue official statements to the
press and publicly engage in activities opposing it.


KOOL! Now we have finally some official support from somewhere
will be going to a community festival in Skykomish Wa saturday to
oppose the greenies with more than just a rag-tag fugitive fleet,this time.
Sure is nice to know that someone(s) listening.[:-][]

[summit daWg]

If you are close to this event and are not in favor of giving up your rights to use National forest land as you can right now and have been forever-Please show up!!!!!

Tuesday September 2, At 7 PM, 1601 AVE. D snohomish WA--behind the Armory firehouse...............The city of Snohomish will be haveing a meeting to decide if they are going ON RECORD as supporting the wild sky wilderness bill. Those of us who OPPOSE this action want to be there IN FORCE to outnumber the " [&:]wildwashington" [&:] greenies[X(] to try to influence this city to use common sense[:-] and reject this idea!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[summit daWg]

[:' (] DOG AND PONY SHOW[:' (] Only one councilman had any sense[] The rest had thier[&:] minds[&:] made up before they got there[X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][:' (]

[summit daWg]

Here is a link for all to get information, and alternate views on this proposal(which the liberal media does not provide you!!)
No Wild Sky
Mind you, I am not against new wilderness areas totally- as long as the are TRUE wilderness areas, as per the US wilderness act of 1964 _ which this area( and the ones in line to be proposed in Washington after this one is railroaded through RE;
I-90, Kettle Range)[:'(] IS NOT!!!

[summit daWg]

TTT

[summit daWg]

I think we might beat this thing again this year!!
Pombo ROCKS!!!