Quote:
Originally Posted by etothepii
I assume this appeal will be appealed. So stupid. I would assume that the law defines "residency" and Emanual either meets or does not meet that definition. It is amazing that different judges can't read a law and decide what it means with any consistency.
|
That's the point. And judges do differ. I have the appellate opinion on my desk in front of me and what others failed to tell you is that Rahm was ruled against 2 to 1 on the panel.
So, the question goes to the state supreme court. Just like those in the armed forces are still resident of the city for voting purposes, I think Rahm was a resident for the purpose of running for mayor.
If you wanna get technical and legalistic.