Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, and Stalin would be proud of Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pa
Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pa., said he would make it a crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or violent against federal officials.
Who is to judge what is threatening? And who said liberals were not out to controle and remove the opposition. Now someone needs to post the liberal play book once again. This lines up nicely with it.
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.
Rep. Robert Brady, D-Pa., said he would make it a crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or violent against federal officials.
Who is to judge what is threatening? And who said liberals were not out to controle and remove the opposition. Now someone needs to post the liberal play book once again. This lines up nicely with it.
It is curiously demonstrative of where the demokrat party has devolved to..they are justly deserving (along with liberal Republicans) of our disgust, disdain, and revulsion. They must be removed from the halls of government at the earliest opportunity...
Who is to judge what is threatening? And who said liberals were not out to controle and remove the opposition.
Wasnt me.
( I dont even understand this whole language, symbol thing... )
^----
>>----]>
[]====
<==[------
>< (@)
__________________
Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.-- Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 18)
Things ain't what they used to be and probably never was. ~Will Rogers
Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday.
"Shouldn't someone tag Mr. Kennedy's 'bold new imaginative program' with its proper age?" "Under the tousled boyish haircut it is still old Karl Marx—first launched a century ago.
There is nothing new in the idea of a government being Big Brother to us all. R.Reagan-1960
Who is to judge what is threatening? And who said liberals were not out to controle and remove the opposition. Now someone needs to post the liberal play book once again. This lines up nicely with it.
Don't know about the liberal play book, but it's a sure bet that the progressive wing of the demokrat party is looking for a putsch...and the first step to succeed (as any good propagandist will tell you), is to silence all political debate but your own...these are perilous times and things are getting dangerous for all concerned....
This is just the start to get the Fairness Doctrine passed. Which is not fair BTW. Until the Liberalpukes can take out all the opposition off the air waves they are not going to be happy.
This is just the start to get the Fairness Doctrine passed. Which is not fair BTW. Until the Liberalpukes can take out all the opposition off the air waves they are not going to be happy.
It's all about CONTROL!
It is for this reason, among many others, that the last election was a milestone for the nation...we can stop the enemy from destroying us from within...hopefully, the 2012 elections will solidify the conservative hold on this government. I would suggest that at that juncture, the government move to legislate against those points held by the enemy as 'necessary' and/or desired. Nip it all in the bud permanently.
The problem here, as I see it, is that we have extended the boundaries of the "Freedom of Speech" so far that we have lost sight of the original purpose of that clause in the First Amendment, which was to protect our right to criticize the government.
__________________
Proud parents of our own "Daddy's Little Girls"
I heard Jesus He drank wine and I bet we'd get along just fine.
The problem here, as I see it, is that we have extended the boundaries of the "Freedom of Speech" so far that we have lost sight of the original purpose of that clause in the First Amendment, which was to protect our right to criticize the government.
THat right is painfully acknowledged....and it is the right that the Marxists seek to abridge, in order to solidify power and invalidate truthful political discourse.