He just doesn't have the nutz to admit the conservatives are right! He was squirming like the worm he is! hahahahah I love it, and it's just the beginning.
Wahhhh.....they won't get in the back and sit down and shut up like I told them too....wahhhh.......
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt
A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2
The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats
the king finds it usefull, now that he knows its not going to go all his own way & cant just dictate & have it his way( lowers his voice & wants to play a lil nicer)
__________________
Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.-- Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 18)
Things ain't what they used to be and probably never was. ~Will Rogers
Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday.
"Shouldn't someone tag Mr. Kennedy's 'bold new imaginative program' with its proper age?" "Under the tousled boyish haircut it is still old Karl Marx—first launched a century ago.
There is nothing new in the idea of a government being Big Brother to us all. R.Reagan-1960
The spin being applied by both sides regarding the Bush Tax Cuts decisions is nothing short of amazing.
The Bush Tax Cuts were widely condemned as benefiting only the rich, yet both sides agreed on the majority of them. The only argument was about the $250k+ brackets.
Still the spin is put forth that the right is robbing social security to put money in the pockets of the rich.
I have no doubt that the bulk of the Bush program will be passed. Never did really. It would be hard for anyone to seriously argue that we need a tax hike at this moment in time and in the wake of what was already passed by the present crew.
Still the spin is put forth that the right is robbing social security to put money in the pockets of the rich.
i also heard wild and hysterical condemnation of the POTUS last night by my compatriots on the left. They were complaining that this would grow the deficit. the irony was palpable.
So now I have a question. Now that the Republicans have been called all these names and or liken to these folks and given the fact that the federal judge said he can't get involved with the way the executive branch conducts it's war on terrorism which allows the assassination of Al Wakey, the American born terrorist, should the Republicans now be afraid of assassination?
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
The spin being applied by both sides regarding the Bush Tax Cuts decisions is nothing short of amazing.
The Bush Tax Cuts were widely condemned as benefiting only the rich, yet both sides agreed on the majority of them. The only argument was about the $250k+ brackets.
Still the spin is put forth that the right is robbing social security to put money in the pockets of the rich.
I have no doubt that the bulk of the Bush program will be passed. Never did really. It would be hard for anyone to seriously argue that we need a tax hike at this moment in time and in the wake of what was already passed by the present crew.
I thought I saw numbers thrown around the other day that the Bush Tax Cuts amounted to $700 Billion for the "rich" and $3 Trillion for everybody else. Not quite sure how anyone who isn't a Democrat or an idiot would define that as "tax cuts for the rich."
As to the use of the word "hostage," I think President Obama will be remembered for having a knack for a poor choice of words, just as President Bush will be remembered for another of clumsy phrases and the continuous use of nucular.
In Obama's case, I think some of his choices inadvertently define his hostility.