So tell me again if you can trust the government with your medical records?
Article
Comments (37)
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 (Updated 11:39 am)
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Accompanying Photos
File photo (Associated Press)
What do you think?
37 comment(s) Read other visitors' comments and post your own.
RALEIGH (AP) North Carolina sheriffs want access to state computer records that identify people with prescriptions for certain drugs, an idea that patient advocates oppose.
The state sheriff's association proposed the idea Tuesday to a legislative health care committee, the News & Observer of Raleigh reported today . The sheriffs said they want access to state computer records identifying anyone with prescriptions for powerful painkillers and other controlled substances.
"We can better go after those who are abusing the system," Lee County Sheriff Tracy Carter said.
More people in their counties die of accidental overdoses than from homicides, the sheriffs said.
The state began a computer database in 2007 to help doctors identify patients who go from doctor to doctor looking for prescription drugs they may not need and to keep pharmacists from supplying patients with too many pills.
Nearly 30 percent of state residents received at least one prescription for a controlled substance in the first six months of 2010, according to the state Department of Health and Human Services. Nearly 2.5 million people filled prescriptions in that time for more than 375 million doses. The database has about 53.5 million prescriptions in it.
About 20 percent of the state's doctors have registered to use the information, and 10 percent of the pharmacies are registered.
Patient advocates say they're concerned about privacy issues for people in pain.
"I don't feel that I should have to sign away my privacy rights just because I take an opioid under doctor's care," said Candy Pitcher of Cary, who volunteers for the nonprofit American Pain Foundation.
The American Civil Liberties Union opposed a bill in 2007 that would have opened the list to law enforcement officials and probably would object to this proposal as well, said ACLU lobbyist Sarah Preston.
"What really did concern us is the privacy aspect," she said.
Opening the record to more users could deter someone from getting necessary medicine because of the fear that others would find out, she said, "particularly in small towns where everybody knows everybody."
__________________
John Adams The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
You can't trust the government for anything what so ever.
I can see this being used as a means to more gun control, illegal warrants, illegal detainment, illegal incarceration and a host of other illegal activities.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
You can't trust the government for anything what so ever.
I absolutely agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbulls
I can see this being used as a means to more gun control, illegal warrants, illegal detainment, illegal incarceration and a host of other illegal activities.
You can't trust the government for anything what so ever.
I can see this being used as a means to more gun control, illegal warrants, illegal detainment, illegal incarceration and a host of other illegal activities.
That's how I see it. I can just see some politician saying, "That guy takes Oxycontin! He can't be trusted with a gun! We need to monitor his finances and supervise him when he plays with his children!"
I hate to say it, but this is one of those rare occasions where the ACLU is right.