So some might have already seen this video, I am not sure. Anyways Obama claims his dad was in WWII. According to wilkipedia his dad was born in 1936 making his dad 9 yrs old when the WWII ended. Here is the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv4jnlkxOaw
__________________
Jake
"The Road to Hell is Paved With Good Intentions"
"Understanding Women Is Like Nailing Jello To A Tree"
Everything that comes out of his mouth is a damn lie. From his place of birth to his fathers war service, to the bills he is pushing. Everything about that POS is a bold face lie and he couldn't care less what the American citizens think. He is going to continue to lie to us and do what ever the hell he wants to do all the while telling us we can go screw ourselves if we don't like it.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
So, according to Snopes he is either lying or he doesn't know the difference between his father and his grandfather. So either he is a bold faced liar or an idiot. I say he is both.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
Saw a bit on snopes some time ago. I believe it's just a husband and wife team? As I recall, both are far-left liberals. How they became accepted as the authority on everything is beyond me. They simply use the internet and research a topic. Anyone else that cares to can do the same.
Either way, bho did say his father served in WWII, and that's not the first or biggest lie he's been caught in.
FWIW, here's a little proof that snopes is biased. They seem to pride themselves on the facts...or do they?
From the snopes site. "Barrack Obama's biological father, Barrack Obama Sr. (born 1936) was a Kenyan who came to America at the age of 23 and attended the university of Hawaii, where he met and married Stanley Ann Dunham - a marriage that produced one son, Barrack Obama Jr..."
The emphasis is mine, and used to point out the fallicy that snopes promotes. The marriage did NOT produce a son--Stanley Ann Dunham was pregnant when she married bho Sr. bho Jr.'s birthdate is August 4, 1961. The couple married on February 2, 1961. Maybe it was an immaculate conception, as some folks seem to believe? I don't think so.
Anyway, point being is you can't put your full faith and confidence in snopes.
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt
A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2
The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats
I'm willing to accept the thinking that Obama meant his grandfather when he made the comment about his father serving in WWII. His biological father played very little part in his life and his grandfather did indeed play the role of father to him. I refer to my stepfather as "dad" even though he really isn't my biological father.
This doesn't mean that I approve of Obama's actions as president however because I certainly do not.
I don't understand the comment that the "marriage did NOT produce a son." His mother was married at the time and you are considered the child of whoever your mother was married to at the time, even if that individual is not your biological father. He would then be considered a product of the marriage.
I was pregnant when we were married and married when Miriam was born. Miriam is, therefore, considered a product of the marriage and my husband is considered her legal father. The time of conception is not relevant unless you get divorced before the child is born. Then it's factored in. My husband could tell you that time limit rule, but he's not here now.
__________________
Proud parents of our own "Daddy's Little Girls"
I heard Jesus He drank wine and I bet we'd get along just fine.