OK, let me get this straight, AZ yes, Black panther party no?
Just a quick question. How is it, that eric holder and the dept of justice, can get away with fileing charges against AZ ,for adopting a law that mirrors the US govt's, but they purposely dropped the charges against the "new black panther party" members who are caught on tape committing blatent voter intimidation????? Seriously, this is beyond scary at this point.
__________________
Folks, it's sick out there, and it's getting sicker.
-Bob Grant
It gets better..... Why does the Justice department not go after 'sanctuary cities' ?
They have also usurped federal immigration powers by offering illegals the comfort and protection of American soil. So, why Arizona and not San Francisco ? I wonder how 'legal' it is for the government to engage in 'selective enforcement' ?
I heard on o'reilly this morning that if Holder would just explain why the justice department has chosen NOT to prosecute that this matter would probably just go away.
This is despite there being enough evidence to indict and prosecute.
I just came across some related news on voter issues. There is a DOJ whistle-blower claiming that the adminstration and the DOJ are not interesting in removing ineligible voters from the rolls because....doing so does not promote greater voter access! Folks who've passed away felons and illegal aliens were specifically mentioned by the whistle-blower.
If there is subsequent attempt to limit the ability to challenge a voter's elgibility, then we'll know where they're trying to go with this.
__________________
Days Full Of Clays...
NWTF, DU, SCI
If congress changes hands this november, is it within the perview of congressional authority to do anything about this sort of administration-sanctioned voter fraud ? Hearings...subpoenas.... Congress (either house of senate) does not prosecute, correct ?
Maybe impeachment proceedings could be in order...these all seem criminal in nature and it appears the admin is in cahoots....
There is such a mountain of evidence on multiple "would be / could be" criminal charges surrounding this administration from the top down they could be impeached on but no one has the stones to get the ball rolling.
I doubt that even when congress changes hands that anyone will have the stones to take Obama and his administration to the mat.
__________________
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency........... Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
There is such a mountain of evidence on multiple "would be / could be" criminal charges surrounding this administration from the top down they could be impeached on but no one has the stones to get the ball rolling.
I doubt that even when congress changes hands that anyone will have the stones to take Obama and his administration to the mat.
Well, the time is not right for that sort of thing right now. The Marxists are in power and they'll never vote to remove the #1 representative of their movement. Congress has to decisively change hands in November and then people have to begin the conversation at that time. They all take an oath to uphold the
constitution and then they systematically disassemble it. The
problem I have, or rather, the worry, is that the change of power
is by no means certain. Some will say both houses will fall to republican majorities...some say only the house but not the senate...some say the other way around. There are others who say there will STILL be democrat majorities in both houses, just not super majorities. Without a mandate indicative of a decisive change in the DC power structure, there's nothing to stop the progressives from turning this country into France.
OK, let me get this straight, AZ yes, Black panther party no?
