logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2010, 07:56 AM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
emptyquiver2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 1,204
Default China To Sterilise 10,000 To Curb Births

sky.com ^ Ah yes, our most favored trading partner, and the one we bow and beg to, in a plea for financial salvation. It must bring joy to a couple of Barry's tsars to hear this news, of what might some day be. Sorta like a kid and the night before Christmas anticapation that engulfs adolescence. The grand Communist utopia, where the world is one big happy ant colony.
emptyquiver2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2010, 10:00 AM   #2
Boone & Crockett
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 17,824
Default

There is at least one high ranking individual in Obama's administration who believes in this. Can't remember his name but it will come to me.
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”

Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'

"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
Fieldmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2010, 12:50 PM   #3
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: El Dorado County California USA
Posts: 8,753
Default

Biden? Or Michelle?
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.

If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
CalHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2010, 01:24 PM   #4
Nontypical Buck
 
emptyquiver2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 1,204
Default

Holdren and Sustein
emptyquiver2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2010, 02:48 PM   #5
Typical Buck
 
Mr. Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amongst far too many liberals
Posts: 919
Default

I wonder... could we do that to welfare recipients in this country?
__________________
Rich

"It takes a Carter to get a Reagan."
Mr. Conservatism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 03:12 PM   #6
Nontypical Buck
 
Kybuckhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,382
Default

This is nothing new...even in the USA. Eugenics was and still is thought by some as necessary. Watch this and educate yourself a little. You can watch the other parts if you like. Hard to believe man thinks they can play God.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veHhc...eature=related

Last edited by Kybuckhunter; 04-25-2010 at 03:30 PM.
Kybuckhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 03:23 PM   #7
Nontypical Buck
 
emptyquiver2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 1,204
Default

Generally argured as one of the reason for the ban on DDT.
emptyquiver2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 05:07 AM   #8
Boone & Crockett
 
The Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burleson Texas
Posts: 11,363
Default

Why should this county care, we kill babies here just before they are born. We care more about the freaking whales, and the wolves than we do innocent children in the womb.
God's wrath is coming down on this country and we deserve it, all of us for not stopping it!
__________________
My knife website
www.knivesbyjank.com
The Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 10:54 AM   #9
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Conservatism View Post
I wonder... could we do that to welfare recipients in this country?
Seriously!

We could limit funding instantly though, last figure i heard was up to 6 children is the max # of children where it pays to have more, ie you get the most $$ for 6 kids, 7 no more $$, 5 you get less $$.

Since the national average is 2.5 kids last I heard....we should limit that number to 2 or 3 kids IMO.

I recently heard a statistic about people in poverty with kids, I think it was something to the affect of young adults with kids who are in poverty, if they have more than 1 kid the odds of them ever getting out of poverty is almost non-existent.
salukipv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:47 AM   #10
Boone & Crockett
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 17,824
Default

Quote:
I recently heard a statistic about people in poverty with kids, I think it was something to the affect of young adults with kids who are in poverty, if they have more than 1 kid the odds of them ever getting out of poverty is almost non-existent.
WE HAVE NO POVERTY IN THIS COUNTRY.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/10/...ing-poverty-2/
Quote:
Today, the U.S. Census Bureau released its annual poverty report. Every year for nearly three decades, in good economic times and bad, Census has reported more than 30 million Americans living in poverty.
What does it mean to be “poor” in America? In reality, the average person, as identified as “poor” by the government, has a living standard far higher than the public imagines. According to the government’s own surveys, the typical “poor” American has cable or satellite TV, two color TV’s, a DVD player or VCR. He has air conditioning, a car, a microwave, a refrig¬erator, a stove, and a clothes washer and dryer. He is able to obtain medical care when needed. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own report, his family is not hungry, and he had sufficient funds in the past year to meet his family’s essential needs.
Conventional accounts of poverty not only give a false picture of material hardship, they also underestimate government spending on the poor. In 2008, federal and state governments spent $714 billion (or 5.0% of the total economy) on means-tested welfare aid providing cash, food, housing, medical care and targeted social services to poor and low income Americans. (This sum does not include Social Security or Medicare.) If converted into cash, this aid would be nearly four times the amount needed to eliminate poverty in the U.S. by raising the incomes of all poor households above the federal poverty levels.
How can the government spend so much and still have such high levels of apparent poverty? The answer is that in measuring poverty and inequality, Census ignores almost the entire welfare state. Census deems a household poor if its income falls below specified federal poverty income levels. But in its regular measurements, Census counts only around four percent of total welfare spending as “income”. Because of this, government spending on the poor can expand almost infinitely without having any detectable impact on official poverty or inequality.
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”

Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'

"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
Fieldmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 PM.