Let's hope the FBI catches every single butthole vandalizing the homes of the congressman and instead of giving them a trial or reading them their rights they send them off to the military for a trial.
No questions asked no jury.
They are domestic terrorists after all!!
I am sure that will make everyone very happy to be maintaining the freedoms of our country
I wonder if any of them carry for protection. If they don't it's a good reason to start. Next time some fool asks if anyone has ever needed a firearm for protection they'll be among the yes crowd. More the merrier. All kinds of wackos out there. Maybe they should move to better neighborhoods.
I am against turning select criminals over to the military and not defending the constitution of the United States because you might be afraid of what will come out at the trial.
I was simply making a point that you can't have it both ways. Be careful what you wish for you just might get it someday.
Don't forget for 1 minute that those that wish to skirt around the constitution in the name of terrorism might someday be lined up for any reason the government wants and treated the same way.
Would be a great way for GUNOWNERS to really have a problem. Cheney could simply declare martial law and could round you all up in the name of terrorism.
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
But to go with what you are saying. Sure, why not. We could start with pulling out all the liberals out of jail who set fire to the cities and flipped cars during their protests the years prior to Obama.
Gawd, what a joke
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.
Would be a great way for GUNOWNERS to really have a problem. Cheney could simply declare martial law and could round you all up in the name of terrorism.
Cheney's not in control now. We will see who rounds up whom and uses the charge. There's a reason "domestic terrorism" has been being defined. It's to have a reason to round up anybody who disagrees. Been done in this country before. The term terrorist is used deliberately.
I have nothing against a trial, but I know all to well that the reason has nothing to do with the guilt of the accused but an avenue to get someone to purger themselves. No smart politician will go on stand willingly. Clinton on the other hand... guy really thinks he's above it all.
You've probably read that the government has the right to suspend habeas corpus during war time. I think it's still war time.
I'm for Americans getting their Constitutional rights, and foreign combatants not.
I'm for Americans who join a foreign forces against the US losing those rights, and being tried as foreign combatants in military courts.
For people who commit crimes in order to advance a foreign cause or ideology, I think there may be grounds for similar action, although it must be defined, and clearly it is not. That is why we have debate over "terrorism."
If a guy (American) bombs a house because he hates the owner, then he is a criminal with Miranda rights, the US Constitution applying fully to his case. If he (still an American) bombs a house because he is part of an organization of angry Canadians (The Canadian Liberation Front, eh) trying to destroy the USA, then he can, IMO, be treated as an enemy fighter, in military courts.
Don't forget for 1 minute that those that wish to skirt around the constitution in the name of terrorism might someday be lined up for any reason the government wants and treated the same way.
That's why I think there needs to be some legal definition made, wherein the efforts of the criminal have been shown to advance a foreign cause result in the change in venue, for the criminal justice system to military tribunal.
That's why I think there needs to be some legal definition made, wherein the efforts of the criminal have been shown to advance a foreign cause result in the change in venue, for the criminal justice system to military tribunal.
For as many wars as we've been in I'm sure a president has been set. I've read of some of the trials. Makes a guy proud to be an American.
Ask this, why hasn't the president been spoken of? Just a ruse to get at Bush and Cheney. Hate motivated at the expense of the country. Pathetic.
Whatever they do in an attempt to get Bush will be used against them and they know it. Probably what's stopping them.
Being as young and small as I am, not to mention female, I hate to be the one to remind some of you dudes, especially WillPa, that this country came about because of a treasonous revolt against the lawfull government of the time.
So should we really be objecting to violent resistance to oppression?
__________________
Proud parents of our own "Daddy's Little Girls"
I heard Jesus He drank wine and I bet we'd get along just fine.
Domestic Terrorists
All kinds of wackos out there. Maybe they should move to better neighborhoods. 
