logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2010, 12:06 PM   #1
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 460
Send a message via AIM to Zeke001 Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke001
Default Another one of those warm fuzzy topics

http://earmarkwatch.org/2008-house-defense/search/

Take a look at your state quick, I am sure you will approve of what you see. THEN, take a look at the other 49 states, and you will be upset. Watched a movie today in my government class, earmarks cost a gov't AT LEAST $80 billion a year... and i think that was 2008 estimates. $80 billion is a lot of money folks, and this is just on STATE projects, and let me reitterate that for you, FEDERAL money on STATE projects...
Zeke001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 03:44 AM   #2
Dominant Buck
 
kevin1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ramsey , Indiana
Posts: 22,547
Default

My state appears to do a lot of medical and military research. States take federal funds for many reasons such as the matching funds that make road building and maintenence affordable, or infrastructure funding. If it weren't for federal grants many rural areas wouldn't be able to fund sewage treatment facility construction, or bridge repairs. there's a difference between pork and progress, the trick is recognizing which the viewer is seeing at the time.
__________________
Kevin Haendiges
NAHC Life Member
NRA Member
Wildlife Forever Member
GOA Member
Buckmasters Member
http://hunting-indiana.com
kevin1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 07:18 AM   #3
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 593
Default

Kevin1

I would run a campaign to shut down all of that evil funding. Every penny of it, no roads jobs etc etc for your area. Save america now!!!!!!
WillPA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 07:19 AM   #4
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 593
Default

That way, Citigroup will not be under such pressure in Manhattan to cut back on 100,000,000 bonus's.

Do your part for the further advancement of america.

Trickle down
WillPA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 08:20 AM   #5
LBR
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 10,247
Default

80 billion divided by 50 equals 1.6 billion per state, if handed out equally. My state got less that 4.7 million. Some of it looks to be justified, some of it looks to be payoffs. Still, paltry by comparison. I wonder which states got the most, and why.
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt

A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2

The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats



LBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 08:26 AM   #6
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 10,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LBR View Post
80 billion divided by 50 equals 1.6 billion per state, if handed out equally. My state got less that 4.7 million. Some of it looks to be justified, some of it looks to be payoffs. Still, paltry by comparison. I wonder which states got the most, and why.
Note that that site only references defense-related earmarks, which is only a portion of all earmarks. I didn't go through all of it, but, California got well over $400 Million, and I'd bet that's the State that got the most. Alaska only got $1 Million. I suspect the Dems were punishing Palin.
ipscshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 08:47 AM   #7
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
Default

If we ignore him, do you think he will start posting under his normal user name?
__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 12:00 PM   #8
Giant Nontypical
 
Knightia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wy
Posts: 7,516
Default

No one must like us


Whatts up wit dat- we get none here in Wy?


If anyone talks with uncle sammy anytime soon- IF he hasnt aleady- tell him ( saw something on the local news about it recently, but missed most of it & didnt catch what else they said) Do get on the ball & clean up that rocket fuel cleaner or whatever it was from awhile ago- that is contaminating some of the water/ land down near Cheyanne.


We dont mind being the nuclear Icbm lanch pad for numurious missles or a target - but do clean up the messes - otherwise we may be forced to charge various fees & costs ++ *to you in the future.



P.s

Sheep & aliens & park animals are not our only natives or beings here & since you have borrowed our NG aircraft,ppl etc that we use for firefighting etc -could you also have some aircraft= sorta close by come summer time if possible.Tnks
__________________
Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.-- Ovid (43 B.C.-A.D. 18)

Things ain't what they used to be and probably never was. ~Will Rogers

Tomorrow hopes we have learned something from yesterday.


"Shouldn't someone tag Mr. Kennedy's 'bold new imaginative program' with its proper age?" "Under the tousled boyish haircut it is still old Karl Marx—first launched a century ago.
There is nothing new in the idea of a government being Big Brother to us all. R.Reagan-1960
Knightia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 02:36 PM   #9
Fork Horn
 
Ol'Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: California
Posts: 347
Default

Nope. There is an article in the San Fran Chronicle today where Gov. Arnold Schwartzenkennedy is bitching about California not "getting their fair share" of the $$$$$. It's a bad sign when you're $20 billion in the hole this far BEFORE the end of the fiscal year without considering pension funding and the like and they base the budget on the amount they begged BHO for out of the "slush fund." We recoup about $.70 for every dollar we send to Washington. They're still spending on our LA to SF bullet train though, can't scrap that to save $$$$, golleeee we might not be able to serve the 100 or so regular riders it will attract. We're dooooooomed!!!!!!!
Ol'Mongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 03:21 PM   #10
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,929
Send a message via AIM to Doe Dumper Send a message via Yahoo to Doe Dumper
Default

I see our esteemed little pos named Nicky Joe on there with 2 earmarks for ManTech International. A quick search of Mantech's PAC reveals...a $2500 campaign contribution in 2010. $1000 in 2006. $1000 in 2004. Plenty of contributions but nothing huge. Still it wreaks.


Id go over Mollohans but everybody knows how slimy he is.
__________________
Right Wing Extremist !!!
Doe Dumper is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 AM.