Quote:
Originally Posted by Alsatian
I understand your explanation. No complaint or disparagement of your analysis, but this does not identify a substantive objection to changing currency.
|
Why not???
If every dollar, peso, deutche mark in the world eventually has to be converted to a new "global unit", therefore making the valuation of everything everywhere in the denomination of "global unit", then the newer global economy will need more centralized economic/banking oversight. A given.
Eventually, this newer and encompassing economic oversight must lead to a more unified legal and social structure throughout the world, in order to maintain an even more homogenous economy. The only way to eventually enforce something like that is by creating a centralized authority. A centralized government with enforcement power. That power will, like with all things involving human nature, incrementally grow. Incrementally shrink the freedoms we have that are already threatened. How could it be anything but???
If we think our freedom as outdoor loving, property owning Americans is fading (even ever-so-slightly) now, wait until 5.5 billion other people, or the rulers thereof, begain to have a say in the way that we conduct ourselves. Centralized money equals, eventually, centralized overseen economy, and that must lead, without forcible revocation, to centralized power. WTH??? What freedom loving American could ever want that??? We may not be able to stop it (who knows), but we definately should not be a proponent of it, should we??
Am I missing something here??
I believe it is a very dangerous path