Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,186
Hey Fodder, please explain this too me.
Could you explain to me why your daddy, Obama, wants a civil defense force funded as well as the millitary???? What domestic threats are there that would call for a hand selected civil defense core the rivals the U.S. military???? Inquiring minds would love to know.
can you say; "mujahadeen", "Brownshirts", etc. etc.
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals dont believe in either of them.
J.F.K. hated liberals.
Last edited by burniegoeasily; 08-28-2009 at 10:24 AM.
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,186
Kevin
That was what I was thinking. Why has Obama called for a civil force equal to our military. Marx's, Hitler, Sadam and the likes keep comeing to mind. Also makes me wonder why 2 trillion dollars has been set aside for the Americorp.?????? Kind of fishy.
I might be paranoid, but this really concerns me.
__________________
kaafir mushrik
Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals dont believe in either of them.
J.F.K. hated liberals.
Last edited by burniegoeasily; 08-28-2009 at 10:26 AM.
Could you explain to me why your daddy, Obama, wants a civil defense force funded as well as the millitary???? What domestic threats are there that would call for a hand selected civil defense core the rivals the U.S. military???? Inquiring minds would love to know.
can you say; "mujahadeen", "Brownshirts", etc. etc.
I dunno? I didn't know the House and Senate had drafted such legislation for him to sign?
Maybe it was just campaign talk? That's the only time I heard it mentioned.
I wouldn't support such a thing.
However many republican Bu****es on this board likely would support Obama's idea. I have seen several times on this board some of the necons say they think military service should be mandatory for all able Americans - military/civilian defense corp. same thing to me.
I disagree.
PS. The religous right would likely have to support Obama's mandatory civil service idea (miltary-same thing) since Isreal does just that - and they RR is never allowed to disagree with Isreal.
__________________
"I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade, which would then force women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations." Senator John McCain
Source: Ron Fournier, Associated Press Aug 24, 1999
This force would not answer to or be any part of the military and will answer only to osama. Like Beck asked, MR President, Who is the enemy that we must defend against? I don't think he will get a answer but I don't think that there is any question as to who his enemy would be.
I dunno? I didn't know the House and Senate had drafted such legislation for him to sign?
Maybe it was just campaign talk? That's the only time I heard it mentioned.
I wouldn't support such a thing.
However many republican Bu****es on this board likely would support Obama's idea. I have seen several times on this board some of the necons say they think military service should be mandatory for all able Americans - military/civilian defense corp. same thing to me.
I disagree.
PS. The religous right would likely have to support Obama's mandatory civil service idea (miltary-same thing) since Isreal does just that - and they RR is never allowed to disagree with Isreal.
You know how I know you're an idiot?.....
__________________ Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my handgun...
However many republican Bu****es on this board likely would support Obama's idea. I have seen several times on this board some of the necons say they think military service should be mandatory for all able Americans - military/civilian defense corp.
Who said that?
Quote:
same thing to me.
You consider serving in the U.S. Military and serving in bho's private army to be the same thing?
Quote:
PS. The religous right would likely have to support Obama's mandatory civil service idea (miltary-same thing) since Isreal does just that - and they RR is never allowed to disagree with Isreal.
Wow--in one short post you have exposed a massive amount of ignorance. You obviously know nothing about the military, Conservatives on this board, the "religious right".......kinda' like bho himself. Quite an accomplishment.
Chad
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt
A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2
The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats
Maybe it was just campaign talk? That's the only time I heard it mentioned.:
Why is it that you would defend someone who says one thing in a campaign and then does something totally different when elected? I'm not indicating Obama has the corner on this market, and I know you'll find something that Bush did to redirect this question, but I'm still going to ask it?
__________________
"Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." G.K. Chesterton
The only plausible explanation that I can come up with is that they are anticipating civil unrest due to the highly questionable actions of the administration and liberal progressive agenda and know that they can't count on the support of the military. I believe it can be summed up by the fact that it would be the liberal version of the SS and the Gestapo.
__________________
Obama=The Fourth Reich,
Just look at the parallels of the Nazi regime and the Obama Administration amazingly similar arent' they.