__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
RE: Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
Changing the definition of words is a favorite ploy of the left. They read law, and if they don't like the law, they just change what thewords mean. One fine example is "gay" marriage. I have never been against gay people getting married. I just never could understand why they would want to,..
their gay. Changing the definition of what marriage ishas always been is about two thirds of that battle. Now they just have to wait until enough ofthe generation that knows better dies off. Clinton, in a weak moment let the cat out of the bag in front of the federal grand jury when he suggested the word "is" could have more than one definition. The only reason he could say such a stupid thing is because that is a liberal tactic. I think that is how a liberal could hear or read something, and get the total opposite meaning from it. I think most of us think secret ballot means nobody else knows how we vote, or how we intend to vote. That evidently is not their definition of"secret" but hey, if de boss man don't know, then I guess it is a secret. Now, sign my card if you know what's good for you.
They have learned words are "just words," and why should the words get in the way of," what's good for the American people."
All Obama has to dois change the name of Guantanamo. He could change it from Guantanamo to Obamaho and turn it into a righteous place overnight.
He could stand up and give one of his classic speeches, and declare they are no longer in Guantanamo, and fool at least half the electorate.
C. Davis
__________________ Am I greedy because I don't want to give you what is mine?
or
Are you greedy because you want to take what is not yours?
RE: Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
I'm pretty sure it's the justice department making these statements ( changing the names )
"In a court filing in Washington, the department said it is developing a new standard for the government's authority to hold detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.
The announcement says the Justice Department will no longer rely on the the president's authority as commander in chief, but on authority specifically granted by Congress."
RE: Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
Quote:
ORIGINAL: kaibab_hunter74
I'm pretty sure it's the justice department making these statements ( changing the names )
"In a court filing in Washington, the department said it is developing a new standard for the government's authority to hold detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.
The announcement says the Justice Department will no longer rely on the the president's authority as commander in chief, but on authority specifically granted by Congress."
Hey kaibab, in war time, the Judicial branch has absolutely no say so in the execution of the war. They have no power. The congress has very limited power and that has to do with declaring war, which they already have and then funding the war. That's it. Obama is disrespecting the office he holds which could have problems down the road. He's too young and too inexperienced to know any better.
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
RE: Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
Quote:
ORIGINAL: Fieldmouse
Quote:
ORIGINAL: kaibab_hunter74
I'm pretty sure it's the justice department making these statements ( changing the names )
"In a court filing in Washington, the department said it is developing a new standard for the government's authority to hold detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.
The announcement says the Justice Department will no longer rely on the the president's authority as commander in chief, but on authority specifically granted by Congress."
Hey kaibab, in war time, the Judicial branch has absolutely no say so in the execution of the war. They have no power. The congress has very limited power and that has to do with declaring war, which they already have and then funding the war. That's it. Obama is disrespecting the office he holds which could have problems down the road. He's too young and too inexperienced to know any better.
I don't even know what you're trying to get at here Mouse. It's the Justice Departments job.... why do question that?
RE: Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
Quote:
ORIGINAL: kaibab_hunter74
Quote:
ORIGINAL: Fieldmouse
Quote:
ORIGINAL: kaibab_hunter74
I'm pretty sure it's the justice department making these statements ( changing the names )
"In a court filing in Washington, the department said it is developing a new standard for the government's authority to hold detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.
The announcement says the Justice Department will no longer rely on the the president's authority as commander in chief, but on authority specifically granted by Congress."
Hey kaibab, in war time, the Judicial branch has absolutely no say so in the execution of the war. They have no power. The congress has very limited power and that has to do with declaring war, which they already have and then funding the war. That's it. Obama is disrespecting the office he holds which could have problems down the road. He's too young and too inexperienced to know any better.
I don't even know what you're trying to get at here Mouse. It's the Justice Departments job.... why do question that?
Please point out where in our constitution the Judical Branch's role in war time is defined? It's not.
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
RE: Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
Quote:
ORIGINAL: Fieldmouse
Quote:
ORIGINAL: kaibab_hunter74
Quote:
ORIGINAL: Fieldmouse
Quote:
ORIGINAL: kaibab_hunter74
I'm pretty sure it's the justice department making these statements ( changing the names )
"In a court filing in Washington, the department said it is developing a new standard for the government's authority to hold detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.
The announcement says the Justice Department will no longer rely on the the president's authority as commander in chief, but on authority specifically granted by Congress."
Hey kaibab, in war time, the Judicial branch has absolutely no say so in the execution of the war. They have no power. The congress has very limited power and that has to do with declaring war, which they already have and then funding the war. That's it. Obama is disrespecting the office he holds which could have problems down the road. He's too young and too inexperienced to know any better.
I don't even know what you're trying to get at here Mouse. It's the Justice Departments job.... why do question that?
Please point out where in our constitution the Judical Branch's role in war time is defined? It's not.
It's not war time in GITMOMouse.... you're confused.
Obama will refer those at Gitmo as "Guests" of the US
