ACORN wins one in Ohio

[MikeVT]

The SCOTUS has just sided with the Ohio Sec of State (dem) saying she does not have to provide an accurate way of checking new voters registrations. She says it would just disenfranchise poor voters and make them stay away from the polls. I think the dems would just like to do away with the election so their anointed one can assume the throne. Excuse me, I have to go wretch.

[Griswold]

Unbelieveable.

[Steve863]

Looks like the so called conservative court is turning socialist also!

[bugsNbows]

Bammy is probably catchin' wood over that decision.

[Alsatian]

ORIGINAL: MikeVT

The SCOTUS has just sided with the Ohio Sec of State (dem) saying she does not have to provide an accurate way of checking new voters registrations. She says it would just disenfranchise poor voters and make them stay away from the polls. I think the dems would just like to do away with the election so their anointed one can assume the throne. Excuse me, I have to go wretch.

It should be pointed out that the SCOTUS doesn't really side with individuals . . . it interprets law. In the present case, as I understand it, the SCOTUS decided that the plaintiff had no legal standing to bring the suite in the first place. That really isn't "siding with the Ohio Secretary of State." I'm not a lawyer, but it sounds like this is a very narrow, technical decision not determined by who has a dog in the fight or by political interests.

That being said, I regret that it turned out that way. I wonder what the right path to resolve this question of the legitimacy of those 200,000 dubious registrations, and I do feel it needs to be resolved, the sooner the better. But I don't blame the SCOTUS for betraying our sect and bouying up the opposing sect. I don't think that is the reality.

[tickman1961]

Registered voters don't necessarily go to the polls and vote........

The actual voters of this nation will pick our next President.

[boysda]

ORIGINAL: tickman1961

Registered voters don't necessarily go to the polls and vote........

The actual voters of this nation will pick our next President.

which is the nub of the matter. voter registration fraud is very different from voter fraud. i am not certain that the fraudulent registrationsare anything more than a bunch of mouth-breathing cretins attempting to reach their registration quotas (and thus get paid their booze money for the day). what i've seen so far is a far cry from a massive conspiracy to have mickey and donald et al cast fraudulent votes in the election. i do however, remain open to the possibility.

[archer 2]

So I take it Boysda illegal registration is ok with you then even though it is against the law. HMMMMM

[boysda]

ORIGINAL: archer 2

So I take it Boysda illegal registration is ok with you then even though it is against the law. HMMMMM

please refer me to where in my post i stated that, or even implied that?

[nodog]

ORIGINAL: MikeVT

I think the dems would just like to do away with the election so their anointed one can assume the throne.

The dems? Wake up! King McCain is already surrounding himself with honies and he isn't even king yet.

As long as you guys continue to refuse to clean up your own party I can't tell a diff between a dem or repub. I even heard people the other day saying how great it would be if they both could rule together one as pres and vise.

The free market is responsible for everything that's going on. Government only takes when it's been given the go ahead by the customers of the free market. Ripe them off and kiss your arse good bye.

Look in the mirror if you don't like this ruling. You know why religion has been kicked out of schools? Because they started it through intolerence of others. Gun control laws started because we didn't want slaves to have guns. Thisruling biting you? Your not blaming enough people for it.