logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2008, 12:24 AM   #1
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,055
Default sex ed bill

Here is what the NYT had to say about it but I would like to see the actual wordingof the bill. If any one ever finds out how to access it please let me know.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/11/us...mp;oref=slogin


If any of you ever find it please let me know.
mudhead1s wife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 04:20 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South of Mason-Dixon
Posts: 1,325
Default RE: sex ed bill

That ad is just the latest in a series of shameful tactics of the McCain campaign. They're playing directly into the hands of the Democrats with the games they're playing. It's time to stop the underhanded mudslinging and start telling the American people what you're going to do for them. McCain had the voters in the palm of his hand after the Palin selection. If he isn't careful, that will be an opportunity squandered. At this point, I'm nearly convinced that the main thing driving McCain to a share of the lead is the weakness of Obama's candidacy. But if McCain is going to win, his campaign is going to have to grow some legs of its own at some point. I disagree with several fundamental parts of Obama's bill, but what's the point in trying to distort his record?

With that said, I'm glad the New York Times has taken it upon itself to show us when the record is being distorted. Now I eagerly await an article examining the things said by the Obama campaign. But I won't hold my breath. Of Larry Rothman's "check point" series in the Times, a single article has yet to be critical of Obama. I know this surprises everyone.
__________________
Politics, it seems to me, all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour
Griswold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 02:42 PM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
younggun308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,661
Default RE: sex ed bill

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Griswold


With that said, I'm glad the New York Times has taken it upon itself to show us when the record is being distorted.
The NYT is a non-player in the whole election after they disqualified themselves during the primaries when they hinted that John McCain could've had sexual relations with a lobbyist, because the article didn't deny it or any possibility of such. After that, the media totally turned on the New York Times, it seems the Wall Street Journal has become the standard for the election, besides, of course, AP, and USA Today.
__________________
Jesus Rules!


younggun308 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 02:56 PM   #4
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,185
Default RE: sex ed bill

Im still up in the air when it comes to this issue. What ive read is not as lude as some make it out to be. What I read stated that the younger level would be recognition of boundaries and that there is inappropriate behavior and touching that the child should not accept. Simply educating the young kids on how to notice sexual predators and how to safeguard themselves from such. Also how to report such things.
__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2008, 03:25 PM   #5
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,055
Default RE: sex ed bill

Quote:
ORIGINAL: burniegoeasily

Im still up in the air when it comes to this issue. What ive read is not as lude as some make it out to be. What I read stated that the younger level would be recognition of boundaries and that there is inappropriate behavior and touching that the child should not accept. Simply educating the young kids on how to notice sexual predators and how to safeguard themselves from such. Also how to report such things.
Yeah that's what I got out of it but I've learned never trust the media, having said that I would still like to be able to read the bill myself, was it left open for interpretation? Or was it a well written bill that left nothing for interpretation? I doubt it outright said anything wrong but the way it read may have been in a way that it could be taken out of context. Either way it was a very strong statement and I wish these ads showed the backing for what they were saying because they are obviously not going away.
mudhead1s wife is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ok, who didn't pay the bill? buttonbuckmaster Bowhunting 28 06-20-2008 03:41 PM
To Bill Chuck7 Religion 3 12-26-2006 07:03 AM
MI Bill 10ptCrossbow Crossbows 4 04-28-2006 09:17 AM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:02 AM.