[/align][/align][/align]Remember Obama said in his book "Audacity of Hope", 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction'.....what better place for the Muslins to control our country, than in the office of the President of USA . [/align][/align]
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."-Fiction! This is a corruption of a quote from Obama's book The Audacity of Hope.It is from a section that talks about the concerns of immigrants who are American citizens.
Here is the accurate and more complete quote: "Of course, not all my conversations in immigrant communities follow this easy pattern. In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the ***anese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
I understand about the ***anese, but were not in aJihadwith the ***anese.We have never had a war like this before, and it's only going to get worse, especially if Obama Hussein is president.
Ya know, Rev, it's beyond me why intelligent people beat the guy up over his name. I don't know about you, but I wasn't allowed any input on the handle I got stuck with when I was born.
Ya know, Rev, it's beyond me why intelligent people beat the guy up over his name. I don't know about you, but I wasn't allowed any input on the handle I got stuck with when I was born.
I don't beat him up over his name ( all though I'd like to ). I can't stand him for being a liberal that thinks the government has the rightto control my money, my health care, and the fact that the genocide of babies is okay, just to mention a few. You think Bush grew government spending, give this idiot enough time and we will all be bankrupt. Have you heard all this great ideas for change?
Yep. I agree with a lot of them. There are two in particular I'm rather fond of.
Making welfare recipients that are capable of going to work get off their lazy tails and make them work their way off the welfare roles.
Fixing up our infrastructure, like the 17,000 bridges in the U.S. that are classified as structurally deficient. The estimated cost for fixing every one of them would be about equal to what we spend every 3 months in Iraq.
Making welfare recipients that are capable of going to work get off their lazy tails and make them work their way off the welfare roles.
You agree of disagree with that statement? You supporting a man who's entire ecomnomic plan is more welfare. So I take it you feel people should be paid to sit at home.
Quote:
Fixing up our infrastructure, like the 17,000 bridges in the U.S. that are classified as structurally deficient. The estimated cost for fixing every one of them would be about equal to what we spend every 3 months in Iraq
That's a farce their Arthur. Define what the term "structurally deficient"means in this context. Second, since when does our governemnt have problems spending less than 30 billion if it truely was needed?
__________________
John Adams “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
when the bridge collapsed in Minnesota, it should've been fixed sooner, but instead, corrupted morons went cheap, and a bunch of people died, seeing the Democrats, I don't see corruption leaving, when you've gota guy who's bought a house from Rezko, getting a discount becuase of a weapons dealer to Saddam, and loving on unrepentant racist terrorists, who picks a VP candidate who's been a Washington insider for 35 years, and both of them havevoted nothing but the liberal party line.
On the other side, you've got a war hero who's voted his concience, against his own party at times, and his VP pick has reformed hopeless political situations in Alaska, and has executive experience, plus she's an impressive woman that's more qualified than the Dem leader.
Audacity of Hope?
