CHICAGO " A joint committee of Chicago City Council has delayed voting on a proposed mandatory spay and neuter ordinance until September in order to allow enough time for both sides to testify. More than four hours of testimony was heard Tuesday, but the committees ran out of time before many people could speak.
The September meeting date has not been set, but Finance Committee Chairman Ed Burke (D-14th) said that everyone who has signed up to testify would get a chance to speak. Aldermen Burke and Virginia Rugai (D-19th) are cosponsors of the ordinance, which would require all dogs and cats to be spayed or neutered at six months of age. The ordinance allows some exemptions for an annual fee of $100 per dog or cat, but imposes strict limitations, and subjects applicants to home inspections and criminal background checks for every family member.
Thus far, 31 people have signed up to speak against the ordinance, compared to 52 animal rights activists who will speak in favor of it.
Animal rights groups packed the meeting with supporters and brought in speakers of national prominence, including Judy Mancuso and celebrity television personality Bob Barker, who have been active in trying to get a statewide pet sterilization law passed in their home state of California. The head of the Illinois Chapter of the radical Humane Society of the United States, Jordan Maytas, and Paula Faseas, founder of the elite and wealthy PAWS rescue program in Chicago, also addressed Council in support of the ordinance.
Mancuso and Barker are known for their emotional presentations that stir audiences, and Barker received a standing ovation. Both are closely linked to animal rights groups that want to eliminate animal ownership, farming of animals and hunting.
In contrast, dog ownership advocates did not show up in force for the meeting and were outnumbered by animal rights activists by a two-to-one margin. About 100 animal rights activists attended the meeting, but only about 50 people came to oppose the ordinance.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance and other organizations launched a large-scale public information campaign in the weeks prior to the committee meeting, but dog owners, cat owners and sportsmen simply did not turn out for the meeting. National research suggests that there are more than 300,000 dog owners in Chicago.
Apathy has plagued advocates for dog ownership since the beginning of the animal rights push several years ago. This has caused animal rights legislation to advance in California, Pennsylvania and other states, and a spay/neuter mandate to be passed into law in Dallas this past June.
Polls show clearly that a vast majority of ordinary Americans oppose mandatory pet sterilization. Polls showing overwhelming opposition to spay/neuter mandates this year were sponsored by Parade Magazine, MSN/NBC, California newspapers and, just this week, by the Chicago Tribune. At this writing, 70 percent of the 8,768 participants in the Chicago poll had voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance.
While opposition to these kinds of laws has consistently been overwhelming, animal ownership advocates also have shown a strong tendency to shun involvement in the political process that can either defend their rights or take them away.
Barker, interviewed after the meeting, said the goal of animal rights groups is to use a Chicago ordinance as a springboard to passing similar ordinances in other cities, and also to pass a statewide spay/neuter mandate in Illinois.
"If you pass this ordinance here there will be cities all over the Midwest and coasts that will pass this as well, and we really need this legislation," Barker said. ""It will spread like wildfire."
With the bitter lesson of Dallas in mind, the American Sporting Dog Alliance emphatically urges dog owners and professionals, sportsmen and farmers to get involved now. We are asking these people to write letters to elected officials, attend meetings, speak out, write letters to the editor, network with other dog owners, participate in message boards and to join at least one of the several fine organizations that are fighting for your rights.
Opponents of the Chicago ordinance who testified Tuesday did an excellent job of delivering the facts, although perhaps some of them lacked the charisma of the public relations pros and TV stars from California.
Very effective oral and written testimony in opposition to the ordinance was presented by the Illinois State Veterinary Medical Association, and the 1,000-member Chicago Veterinary Medical Association. Both groups of veterinarians came out strongly against the ordinance.
"Although the ordinance¹s stated goals to reduce the number of unwanted pets and gang activity are laudable, the reality is that it (the ordinance) will have no effect on these problems. Instead, it will create some serious public health concerns, cause many animals to be denied necessary health care, and will trample on the personal property rights of conscientious pet owners," Dr. Steve Dullard, ISVMA Legislative Committee Chair, told the aldermen.
"The idea that mandatory spay/neuter will change a gangbanger's behavior or that dog bite injuries will vanish is absurd," he said. Those are two reasons that Burke and Rugai cite as justifications for the ordinance.
Barker said that all that the veterinarians care about is money, and Mancuso dismissed the medical testimony by claiming that most rank and file veterinarians favor the ordinance.
Dr. Shannon Greeley, speaking for the Chicago veterinarians, said the entire membership of CVMA is opposed to the ordinance, not just the board. Greeley testified that the problems with the ordinance could have been avoided if City Council had asked veterinarians to participate in the planning process.
Some aldermen left the room when the veterinarians were testifying, and Alderman Leslie Hairston suggested that the veterinarians were merely piqued because they were not involved in planning the ordinance.
Dr. Greeley said the issue is not simply that veterinarians were offended. She said the real issue is that veterinarians have the expertise and experience to help council create workable programs.
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which operates many animal shelters around the country, also is opposed to mandatory pet sterilization, Dr. Greeley said.
Here is the ASPCA"s position statement: "The ASPCA supports programs that provide incentives to the public to spay or neuter their companion animals. The ASPCA does not support local laws that mandate the sterilization of all cats and dogs."
Steve Dale, a local animal behavioral consultant and radio talk show host, countered the inaccurate assertions in Barker"s and Mancuso"s testimony. Dale said similar ordinances have failed everywhere they have been tried. Most recently, he said, the Greeley, Colorado, animal control director told him that a new ordinance there was a complete failure.
Other speakers questioned the city"s ability to pay for enforcing the ordinance. Before the hearing on the ordinance, the aldermen were informed that the City of Chicago has a projected $4.6 million budget shortfall this year and will have to lay off employees.
Chicago Animal Care and Control Executive Director Sandra Alfred spoke in favor of the ordinance, but questioned the city"s ability to pay for enforcement.
Several aldermen expressed other kinds of reservations about the ordinance.
"We can't even enforce the licensing of our dogs in the city," said Alderman Bob Fioretti (D-2). He said that he doubts 10-percent of the dogs in the city are licensed, because people know that the city does not have the manpower to do the job.
Alderman Ray Suarez (31st), said it is another example of government interference in private lives. Alderman Freddrenna Lyle (6th) expressed concern that under the ordinance she wouldn't be able to mate her Lhasa apso with another cute dog unless she obtained a breeders license.
What You Can Do To Help
It is very important for dog owners to contact City Council members before the September committee meeting. This ordinance can be stopped if strong opposition arises from every neighborhood in Chicago, and from all segments of the dog community. Letters sent to the aldermen by surface mail are the most effective, followed by faxes and phone calls. Emails are the least effective. Even if they are brief, personal letters are much more effective than form letters.
Here is a link to City Council Committees: http://www.chicityclerk.com/standingcommettee.php. Tuesday"s meeting will involve both the Committee on Finance and the Committee on License and Consumer Protection. This web page gives links to each committee member.
Next, please contact your friends and members and officers of any clubs or organizations you belong to that can help. These include dog clubs, sportsmen"s clubs, farmers" groups and firearms rights organizations. Hunters, farmers and firearms enthusiasts know that these kinds of laws stem from animal rights groups that also want to eliminate hunting, raising animals for food and the right to keep and bear arms.
In addition, please join a dog owners" rights advocacy organization that reflects your personal concerns and priorities.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, hobby breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life. Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org or contact us at asda@csonline.net.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of our members, and maintain strict independence.
Why can't we mandate spaying and neutering of every Dem out there?
__________________
John Adams The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
Mancuso and Barker are known for their emotional presentations that stir audiences, and Barker received a standing ovation. Both are closely linked to animal rights groups that want to eliminate animal ownership, farming of animals and hunting.
I'd bet they are all for banning pit bulldog "types" too. Isn't it nice when someone who doesn't know you or a thing about you(or care to)raises a stink to pass a law to impose their opinions and ideas on you and your family?
Chad
__________________
"We can have no '50-50' allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all."-- Theodore Roosevelt
A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left. Ecclesiasties 10:2
The last four letters in American..........I Can
The last four letters in Republican........I Can
The last four letters in Democrats.........Rats
and subjects applicants to home inspections and criminal background checks for every family member.
You think this is the end, it's the begining. The worst thing in my mind is how many people on this board were worried about their phone call being listen to when their brother from Al Qaeda called them and they are silentto the trueintrusion to their freedom to own a dog.
__________________
John Adams The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.
Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'
"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
We all know about "freedom of religion" as it is defined in the Bill of Rights. That can mean many things to many people, but to me, one of the most important things is that it means freedom of conscience: The right to define my own beliefs and live according to them.
As a society, we have interpreted "religion" very narrowly, to mean a church or a particular doctrine. With this narrow definition, all of us are fair game to the kinds of animal rights laws you see coming down in Chicago and other places.
That narrow definition really translates into everyone believing they have the power to impose theirVALUES and BELIEFS on other people, as long as they don't involve a particular church or religious doctrine.
The animal rights movement is a major example of this.Its belief is that animal ownership is exploitation and slavery, as is farming animals, and hunting is a form of barbarity. Given the narrow definition of the Bill of Rights in the courts, they feel thatthey havethe power to seek laws to force us to live by their beliefs.
As in Chicago and many other places, all it takes is a majority vote by Congress, a legislature or even a city council, and everyone is fair game to being told who to be and how to live.
Make no mistake about it, the animal rights movement is a religion in every sense of the word. These people hold their beliefs with a kind of fanaticism we associate with a bin Laden. They believe they are saving the world.
Like all religious fanatics, they will do anything to get what they want. The end justifies the means.
They want to force their religion down our throats.
The worst thing in my mind is how many people on this board were worried about their phone call being listen to when their brother from Al Qaeda called them and they are silentto the trueintrusion to their freedom to own a dog.
this crap is rediculous.....just like the stupid things our congress takes so much time on, don't you think there's more important things for the city of Chicago to worry about. Seriously, they are contending that this law will reduce gang activity, what a joke.....I know one thing that WILL reduce gang activity, how about taking all of the money and time that would go into the enforcement of this new rule and put a few more cops on the beat in areas that have a lot of gang activity. I wonder which would make the biggest difference. Some people's blatant ignorance and naiveness amaze me.
how many wild dogs are out there? or dogs being impregnated by a stray etc...?
I think the larger problem has to be dogs being turned in by owners.
As far as Mandatory? What are dog breeders to do? stop?
Also isn't this my choice? If I'm responsible and take care of my dog, it won't be impregnating another dog or being impregnated.
What laws do is hurt the good people. They hurt the people who love their animals and care about them.
The stupid people ignore them.
The good news is that there are far less stupid people today, when it comes to animals. Right now, 60% of all dogs already are spayed/neutered. Over the past 10 years, shelter admissions and euthanasia rates have been cut in half. Those are easily verifiable facts.
Chicago Dog Law "Will Spread Like Wildfire"
