544. Step by step, dogs take over the power (3/14/08)

[kathaksung]

544. Step by step, dogs take over the power (3/14/08)

I went back to the freedominion.com site and found its window background went back to the usual format. The missing two years postings came back too like nothing had happened. Only the message I posted on March 1st 08 is missing which reminds me it was not a dream. The surveillance server did supply me the old format on 3/1 then pulled it back later. That action carried away the message I posted on that day. I tried the url I loaded on that day. It leads to another thread of two years ago which I have never attended. It may prove Feds did give me the old thread which was intercepted two years ago. So when they withdrew it(url) from the list they had to replace it by a nearby thread that ends at same time - April 2006.

This is a typical way how Feds manipulate this country. They control media and internet. They intercept and censor your post if they don't like it while you misunderstand your post could be read by other people. Election is similar. Feds control the election office. People who vote thought their ballot would be counted. As a matter of fact, the officer who control voting box decide everything. If the result meets their will, they let it go. Otherwise they censor it and give out a fake one. Nobody can verify it. What they need to do is to let out some reason in media to justify the result.

Three days ago, news reported: "SPITZER/ Federal wiretap caught plans to meet prostitute". "January FBI stakeout of Spitzer reported". From the topic I got three points. 1. Demo is the target. (Spitzer is an elite of Democrats) 2. FBI openly show off in stage. 3. Wiretap emphasized. It is an extortion from DOJ obviously. What relates to these three points recently? Warrantless wiretap!

Here is a brief news today:
"House closes doors to debate wiretapping

The House held a closed session Thursday for the first time in 25 years to discuss a hotly contested surveillance bill.

Republicans requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the new Democratic eavesdropping measure that is opposed by the White House and most Republicans in Congress.

Lawmakers were forbidden to disclose what was said during the hourlong session. The extent to which minds were changed, if at all, should be more clear today, when the House was expected to openly debate and then vote on the bill."
(Mercury News 3/14/08)

Human raise dogs to protect their homes. Dogs were chained because otherwise they might kill with the power they were given. But with so much power dogs want to be master to govern the human. So they had a false flag attack on 9/11 2001. Now it's another extortion to increase dogs' power - to attack on their own will. (Dogs used to be told they could only attack with the permission of human - a court warrant) Under the extortion of the dogs, will human give them another blank check?


545. Warrantless wiretapping law and my case (3/19/08)


At least two provision in Patriot Act are designed particularly for my case. One is the Library surveillance and the other is the moveable phone-line surveillance (on any phone suspect used not particular on one fixed phone line.) Because I found that my article in internet could only be readable on computer connected to my phone line but couldn't be found on computer which connected to my tenant's phone line, although we lived in same house. Later I tried to verify this censorship in computer of public library. So I knew the provision is targeting on my case when they changed the Act.

But even under Patriot Act, Feds need warrant to legally put me under surveillance. I am neither a terrorist nor a drug dealer, how could they get warrant from the judge? At first they cheated the judge, then Feds just abandoned that effort. They simply authorized themselves to monitor without warrant - by warrantless surveillance. This is, anyhow, a big violence to the civil rights the Constitution promises to the citizens. The principle of Check and Balance collapsed before it.

So the Warrantless wiretap law was only a temporary one. It was designed to be terminated in the end of January 2008. I observed there were three attempts of elimination on me (and my family) combined with attempts of Iran war. I found these three attempts matched with the expiration of the warrantless wiretap too.

1. The warrantless wiretap law expired on 1/31/08. The effort of elimination by missile bombing - in the name of Asteroid 2007 TU24 would hit Earth on 1/24. An undersea cable was cut at the Iran door step on 1/23.

2. That wiretap law was extended 15 days hastilily from 2/1 to 2/15. Second elimination attempt by liquefaction earthquake - a two weeks' continuous rain followed by two earthquakes in my area on 2/4.

There was another undersea cable cut at the Irans doorstep on 2/3.

3. On 2/12, Senate passed to extend that eavesdropping law for another 6 years. It failed in the House. Why Feds didn't get it passed this time? I think maybe they were more confident on the third operation. The spy satellite would have more accurately crashed at target area. The Iran war would have been a big one with multi-nations to join, especially France. The third operation was a big one.

This is why I think Spitzer case was for reviving the warrantless eavesdropping law. After the three operations went soured, Feds renew their effort - reset their secret deal with China (to frame a case) and plan new case for Iran war. The harassment in internet is even more aggressive. It is a lawless rogue team. It took me hours to post an article in internet sometimes.

[kathaksung]

I used to use "fast reply" to continue with the old thread. When the "fast reply" lost function, I had to post with a "new thread" to test if everything is losing function. It works.

Then I found "post reply" still functioned. So I continue to use the "post reply" with the old threads. But that test makes this new thread a double post. Sorry for that.

[don128]

very interesting post.

[Lubricious]

You read it?

[sachiko]

ORIGINAL: Lubricious

You read it?

Yes I did. But it was hard to concentrate because my foil hat kept slipping down over my eyes.

[Lubricious]

Look out, its the G-men Roflcopter.