Obama's radical preacher making his national debut, the press turning themselves inside out to excuse Obama's 20-some year association with this cranked up wacko, Hillary doing shot shooters with the boys, trying be a "good ol' boy," and the whole "bitter" fuss, and on it goes.
Obama is devoid of substance and would not have a prayer were he white...not a prayer. Clinton is as phony as a $3 bill and I mean phony to the bone. She gags me.
What a zoo. God help us if one of these two gets to sit at the helm for four years.
Whatstrikes me is the impression I get from the press is that these two dazzling, super-smart, polished, urbane Democratic candidates are supposed to be slam-dunks in the presidential election. I'm thinking they might be in for a surprise. The Democrats have not gone with "change," it is the same old liberal soup of ideas. The only "change" is from GW Bush, but McCain offers that as well -- McCain isn't Bush.
Because both Obama and Clinton are your typical, same-ol' same-ol' liberal, this is precisely what will be shown against them. McCain is much more middle of the road than either Obama and Clinton. As usual, the primary season has forced the Democratic contenders to fight to out-liberal each other; the Republican nominee shuffles over to the middle; in the end the Democratic presidential nominee is typically stuck with the far left while the Republican presidential nominee is left with the middle and far right -- 2/3's versus 1/3. Not exactly correct, of course, but you get the picture. This movement of both Clinton and Obama to the left will be used against them, I'm hoping, by McCain.
Hillary is your typical baby killing, homosexual supporting, liberal wacko. [:@]
Obama is as well. However, he is especially dangerous and a very real threat to our country. [:@]
speaking as a baby killing, homosexual supporting liberal wacko, i nonetheless suspect you meant that term as a pejorative?
VC,I tend to agree with you that we're not looking at an "A list" of candidates. I am deeply conflicted on this one however, and simply cannot bring myself to vote for any candidate who supported the war. As is obvious, that really limits my options.
Hillary is your typical baby killing, homosexual supporting
baby killing huh? please explain.
and seeing the negative way in which you spoke of her "supporting" homosexuals, could you please give a reason as to why you are against homosexuality? and lets not her the ol' "well its in the bible" line, lets get beyond 3rd grade
We have three US senators running all over the country telling lies inan attempt to get elected POTUS. They are not doing the job their constituents elected them to do.
I'm lovin' this campaign...
