logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Non Hunting > Politics

Politics Nothing goes with politics quite like crying and complaining, and we're a perfect example of that.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2008, 04:53 PM   #1
Giant Nontypical
 
Phil from Maine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northeastern Me.
Posts: 8,071
Default Now Where do you think we are heading?

I am not sure about all this but it sure doesn't look very good to me.. Will we be attacking Iran? This report says we will most likely quite soon..






Source: U.S. Strike on Iran Nearing






Monday, April 14, 2008 9:37 PM

By:Jim Meyers
Article Font Size









Contrary to some claims that the Bush administration will allow diplomacy to handle Iran"s nuclear weapons program, a leading member of America"s Jewish community tells Newsmax that a military strike is not only on the table " but likely.

"Israel is preparing for heavy casualties," the source said, suggesting that although Israel will not take part in the strike, it is expecting to be the target of Iranian retribution.

"Look at Dick Cheney"s recent trip through the Middle East as preparation for the U.S. attack," the source said.

Cheney"s hastily arranged 9-day visit to the region, which began on March 16, included stops in Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, Turkey, and the Palestinian territories.

Tensions in the region have been rising.

While Israel was conducting the largest homefront military exercises in its history last week, Israel"s National Infrastructure Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer warned Tehran about expected attacks on the Jewish state.

"An Iranian attack will prompt a severe reaction from Israel, which will destroy the Iranian nation," he said.

He predicted that in a future war, "hundreds of missiles will rain on Israel," but added that Iran "is definitely aware of our strength."

In addition to long-range missiles Iran has been developing to strike Israel, Israel"s military strategists see the Iranians using terror groups they back like Hamas operating from Palestine and Hezbollah from Lebanon to launch attacks.

Iran has supplied Hezbollah with an arsenal that now contains "tens of thousands of missiles," according to the Washington Post.

IIsrael"s recent war exercises, including preparations for chemical and biological weapons attacks, drew a sharp response from Syria which held its own military drills. The Syrian government accused Israel of preparing for a war which Damascus predicted would be begin anytime between May 1 and the end of June.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently told foreign journalists that Israel needs to confront the threat posed by Iran. Privately he has been telling associates his number one priority is have the Israeli military strike Iran if the U.S. is unwilling.

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz disclosed that Israel is concerned that North Korea has transferred technology and nuclear materials to Iran to aid Tehran"s secret nuclear weapons program.

Iran remains intransigent to international pressure that it offer full transparency relating to its nuclear program. On Sunday the head of Iran"s nuclear program "abruptly canceled a meeting with the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, dealing a blow to the U.N. monitor's efforts to investigate allegations that Iran tried to make nuclear arms, an agency official said," according to an AP report.

"But a senior diplomat had told the AP that IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] head Mohamed ElBaradei likely planned to use the meeting with Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, the head of Iran's nuclear program, to renew a request for more information on allegations Tehran had tried to make atomic arms."

A number of signs indicate that, contrary to the belief President Bush is a lame duck who will not act before he leaves office, the U.S. is poised to strike before Iran can acquire nuclear weapons and carry out the threat of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to "wipe Israel off the map":

[*]According to intelligence sources, the administration now rejects the National Intelligence Estimate report issued in December that asserted Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in late 2003.


The French daily Le Monde reported in March that newly surfaced documents show that Iran has continued developing nuclear weapons. In late 2006, U.S. intelligence reportedly intercepted a phone conversation in Iran"s Defense Ministry in which the nuclear weapons program was discussed.

[*]The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, Admiral William Fallon, resigned in March amid media reports that he broke with President Bush"s strategy on Iran and did not want to be in the chain of command when the order comes down from the President to launch a strike on the Islamic Republic.


Democrats suggested he had been forced out because of his candor in opposing Bush"s Iran plans, and Esquire magazine contended that Fallon"s departure signaled that the U.S. is preparing to attack Iran.

[*]According to a Tehran-based Iranian news network, Press TV, Saudi Arabia is taking emergency steps in preparing to counter any "radioactive hazards" that may result from an American attack on Iran"s nuclear facilities.


The Saudi newspaper Okaz disclosed that the Saudi government has approved nuclear fallout preparations, and the Iranian network reported that the approval came a day after Cheney met with the kingdom"s high-ranking officials, further stating that the U.S. "is now informing its Arab allies of a potential war."

[*]The American commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, has stepped up criticism of Iran, telling Congress last week that Iranian support for Shiite militias posed the most serious threat to Iraq"s stability. He told senators : "Iran has fueled the violence in a particularly damaging way." Last week, the U.S. said Iran was providing insurgents with missiles that were killing Americans and hitting targets within the U.S. occupied Green Zone in Baghdad.


MSNBC Commentator Pat Buchanan said Petraeus" remarks to Congress lay the groundwork for a U.S. attack on Iran.

[*]President Bush said in a speech at the White House on April 10 that Iran, along with al-Qaida, are "two of the greatest threats to America."


He said Iran "can live in peace with its neighbors," or "continue to arm and train and fund illegal militant groups which are terrorizing the Iraqi people " If Iran makes the wrong choice, America will act to protect our interests and our troops and our Iraqi partners."

He later told ABC News that if Iran continues to help militants in Iraq, "then we"ll deal with them."

Members of Congress are said to have been briefed by the administration about the rising Iran threat.

Iran did little to cool tensions when it announced that it had begun installing 6,000 new centrifuges at its uranium enrichment plant in Natanz.

Centrifuges can enrich uranium to a low level to produce nuclear fuel or a high level for use in weapons.

The announcement of the new centrifuges by President Ahmadinejad came on April 8, Iran"s National Day of Nuclear Technology, which marked the second anniversary of Iran"s first enrichment of uranium.

Iran already has about 3,000 centrifuges operating in Natanz, and the new announcement was widely seen as a show of defiance to international demands to halt a nuclear program that the U.S. and its allies insist is aimed at building nuclear weapons.


Will a draft becomeing out of this as we already know our men and women of the military is running in short supply..
Phil from Maine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 05:19 PM   #2
Giant Nontypical
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comanche Co., OK
Posts: 8,889
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

Any attack on Iran could be a catastrophic event for US troops in Iraq. Iran would invade Iraq in force in order to get at US troops.
falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 05:38 PM   #3
Giant Nontypical
 
Phil from Maine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northeastern Me.
Posts: 8,071
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

I am not saying we will or not but I do think we need to watch this closer as things start heating up. I do believe that Bush may in fact try it, if not Isreal already said they will if need be..
Phil from Maine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 07:05 PM   #4
Boone & Crockett
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,133
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

I vote no. We have more than we can deal with in Iraq. Iran should have been the target all along but we knew they would present much more of a problem than Iraq.
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
Champlain Islander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 07:11 PM   #5
Boone & Crockett
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,458
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

Quote:
Contrary to some claims that the Bush administration will allow diplomacy to handle Iran"s nuclear weapons program, a leading member of America"s Jewish community tells Newsmax that a military strike is not only on the table " but likely.
How does he know what we are going to do? Israel and American Jews have been trying to get us to attack Iran for three years now.
__________________
You're only one post away from a federal watch list.
Charlie P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 07:22 PM   #6
Boone & Crockett
 
Fieldmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Posts: 17,824
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Charlie P

Quote:
Contrary to some claims that the Bush administration will allow diplomacy to handle Iran"s nuclear weapons program, a leading member of America"s Jewish community tells Newsmax that a military strike is not only on the table " but likely.
How does he know what we are going to do? Israel and American Jews have been trying to get us to attack Iran for three years now.
Because everyone knows un-named well conected sources are never wrong.
__________________
John Adams The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.

Ronald Reagan: 'Everybody that is for abortion has already been born'

"I never said I was worth it. I only said I wouldn't do it for less " William F. Buckley Jr.
Fieldmouse is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 07:47 PM   #7
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

Alot of sable rattling. But that got us in trouble before.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 09:26 PM   #8
Boone & Crockett
 
Aught Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 13,219
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

I don't seeit happening within the next couple of years. Anything we do will be extremely covert and localized, if we move at all.

Israel's running out of friends, and they feel the heat. Sucks to be them. Maybe next time they'll pay more attention to what we want.
__________________
Matthew 18:3-6
Aught Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 01:10 AM   #9
Giant Nontypical
 
bergall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,280
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

I'm hoping we can keep boots off the ground in Iran.
I think the issue of arms sales and suppport for foreign insurgents by the Iranian government in the
cause of Iraqi insurgence is the issue here. The nuclear issue is a non-issue, or at least, not the pressing
issue. Now, while the Iranian militiary may look impressive goose-stepping all around the square,
we saw the same thing in Iraq and they folded like a cheap suit. I'll admit that on the surface, it looks like
the Iranian people are more unified than the many fractured factions in Iraq. Still, we certainly have enough military might to make Iran wish it had bargained a bit better, but it's another destabilizing influence in the region. If the flow of oil is the issue, I'd think expanding hostilities to Iran would SLOW the flow of oil rather than make things easier. On the other hand, some of those body bags coming back are thanks to Iranian weapons in the hands of insurgents. Why not 'wack' admedinijad (or whatever this rat-bag's name is) with some of those wonderful laser-guided missiles we saw so much of in the opening days of the Iraqi war ?
I remember we rattled Khaddafi's cage back in the 80's (was it the 80's ?) and we've not heard a peep out of him since.....
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
bergall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 07:00 AM   #10
Boone & Crockett
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in the west coast of New England
Posts: 13,133
Default RE: Now Where do you think we are heading?

Kind of odd though that the whack job in Iran is continually begging the US to invade. He continues to thumb his nose at all the sanctions and regulations about nuclear proliferation the free world has given. What is his goal?
__________________
Too busy with fishing to spend much time here.
Champlain Islander is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heading Out Semisane Black Powder 9 10-05-2008 08:42 PM
heading to MI bowhunter1984 Black Powder 4 11-22-2007 07:43 AM
Heading out!! twildasin Bowhunting 4 10-09-2007 06:30 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 AM.