Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.
The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.
It draws on growing evidence "“ exclusively reported in the IoS in October "“ that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.
Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimise handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.
Professor Khurana "“ a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers "“ reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.
He admits that mobiles can save lives in emergencies, but concludes that "there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumours". He believes this will be "definitively proven" in the next decade.
Noting that malignant brain tumours represent "a life-ending diagnosis", he adds: "We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation." He fears that "unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive steps", the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now, by which time it may be far too late to intervene medically.
"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking," says Professor Khurana, who told the IoS his assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million worldwide each year, and exposure to asbestos is responsible for as many deaths in Britain as road accidents.
Late last week, the Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". It believes he "does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".
^
Sounds like what the cig comapanies said when it came out cigs caused cancer.
__________________
You're only one post away from a federal watch list.
I carried a 5-watt police radio next to my kidney for almost 17 years and often wondered about the long term effects. I know there are contradictory studies out for cell phones, police and other radios and even high voltage lines overhead. It's one of those things that you never truly know for sure about and hope you're not setting yourself up for cancer or something else.
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.
If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
I actually know a fewcops who've had that happen (another reason I never wanted to mess with radar). I don't know all of the details but I believe a hand held radar unit emits a much higher level of radio waves to operate. A standard police hand held radio emits 5 watts and most of today's cell phones are emitting .6 (6/10ths) of a watt.
__________________
Jesus Christ--The reason for the season!
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a veteran.
If you're certain you know everything, there's little opportunity to learn anything.
I wouldn't doubt it. I mean IEEE tells women that are pregnant not work in high electromagnetic field envirments like power plants, but then the goverment publications say its safe. Yea right.RF energy does mutate cells. High RF energy. But long term subtle effects (like Cal was talking about with his radio) can only be determined after a bunch of people died and we can look back.
You know my uncle and I were discussing this the other day. Our great-great grandfathers lived in an enviroment with good ozone shield, could drink the waters right out of most rivers, and all thier animals were nature, and no RF fields. No wonder cancer is everywhere.
I have a chart in my office that shows the RF spectrumsfrom the FCC. It just boggles my mind, that we are being bombarded every day with everthing from 2Khz to 100Ghz. There is very little open space in the middle of the spectrum.
Cell Phones a real killer?
